AN independent watchdog has branded services provided by the police and the HNS to victims of sex crime "unacceptable".
The review by HM Inspectorate of Constabulary in Scotland (HMICS) said there is "much more to be done" for a consistent service to be in place across the country, and that Scotland lagged "well behind" the rest of the UK.
It spoke of an an urgent need for work to end victims being examined in police stations and said there needed to be facilities which meet both the needs of victims and the necessary forensic requirements.
Inspectors also highlighted how a lack of availability of services in some places can mean lengthy journeys for victims, including abused children, who may be asked not to wash for a day or more after an assault.
The Scottish Government said an expert group, chaired by Chief Medical Officer Dr Catherine Calderwood, is being established to drive improvements in the provision of health services for victims of rape and sexual assault.
Ministers last month announced the introduction of new national standards for forensic examinations of victims.
The HMICS spoke of "committed and dedicated professionals" working to deliver high-quality forensic medical examinations but said victims are being "let down" by the standard of service available at some times and in some areas of the country.
"Significant variations in the provision of forensic medical services in Scotland persist, with issues of availability as well as geography making the quality of service offered to some victims of sexual crime unacceptable," the report said.
Inspectors continued: "Adult victims of sexual crime continue to undergo forensic medical examinations in police buildings in many areas of Scotland.
"This is not victim-centred or considered effective practice."
The report added: "Lack of availability of services locally leads to delays and lengthy journeys for victims of sexual crime, who can be asked not to wash for a day or more after an assault."
Among a range of findings, inspectors also found a "lack of leadership and governance" over the provision of forensic medical services, that the provision of essential equipment for examinations is inconsistent across Scotland and that some suspects are being examined in police custody settings which may not be "forensically-secure environments".
Gill Imery, Assistant Inspector of Constabulary at HMICS, who led the review, said investment is needed to address the current "disparity" in forensic healthcare services across Scotland.
"At present, challenges in staffing of services and access to resources, particularly in remote and rural areas where victims may be required to travel some distance to access services, varies greatly and this is to the detriment of victims of sexual crime," she said.
The review has identified 10 recommendations designed to improve services.
"Sexual crimes have a devastating effect on victims and so it is imperative that the support they receive, both from health and criminal justice professionals is high-quality and consistent irrespective of where they live," Ms Imery added.
Justice Secretary Michael Matheson said: "The current provision of services for victims of rape and sexual assault is provided by motivated and committed professionals but more needs to be done to create a consistently high standard of service across Scotland.
"We know these individuals need the very best care at a time of great trauma and while a forensic examination may be necessary for evidential reasons, there is a need to ensure the response is first and foremost health0focused and victim-centred."
Health Secretary Shona Robison added: "It is important that we look at how we ensure survivors of sexual crimes across Scotland are able to access skilled and empathetic professionals, regardless of where they are in the country, and we will use the analysis of this survey and the advice of this expert group to improve the support for victims of these horrendous crimes."
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel