Waiting times for cancer patients have been described as "unacceptable" by charities after new figures revealed key targets have been missed again.
Hundreds of patients are waiting longer than they should for treatment, according to statistics covering the final three months of 2016.
Health boards should ensure at least 95% of patients urgently referred with a suspicion of cancer will wait a maximum of 62 days from referral to first cancer treatment.
Statistics show only 87.5% of patients - 2,846 out of 3,254 - started treatment within the 62-day standard in the final quarter of last year, compared to 87.1% in the previous quarter.
Only five health boards - Borders, Dumfries and Galloway, Lanarkshire, Orkney and Shetland - met the target.
The 31-day standard - to ensure 95% of patients will wait no more than 31 days from decision to treat to first cancer treatment - was also missed.
In the final three months of 2016, 94.1% of patients started treatment within the 31-day standard, a slight decrease from 94.3% in the previous quarter.
The 31-day standard was met by 11 out of 15 NHS boards.
Gregor McNie, of Cancer Research UK, said: "These latest figures show once again a worrying picture for cancer services, with many patients still waiting an unacceptably long time to start cancer treatment.
"Speedy diagnosis and access to treatment is key to improving someone's chances of survival so it's absolutely critical we see improvements soon.
"Over a year on from when the Scottish Government announced its new cancer strategy, it's clear many health boards need to make better progress, and show progress from new investments."
Janice Preston, of Macmillan Cancer Support, said: "It is unacceptable that the cancer waiting times targets have been missed for four years in a row.
"We would like all health boards to list the reasons why they are missing the targets so we can look at ways of improving services for cancer patients at such a vital time."
Health Secretary Shona Robison said the Scottish Government wants to do more to ensure targets are met.
"Backed by our five-year £100 million cancer strategy, last December I announced a number of changes to benefit patients and increase access for all cancer patients - particularly focused on urology and colorectal cancer.
"We are also reforming outpatient services, streamlining access to cancer specialists and decreasing the time it takes to get a diagnosis."
Ms Robison also announced £180,600 of funding for a new scheme to decrease health inequalities connected to cervical cancer screening rates.
Charity Jo's Cervical Cancer Trust has been given the cash through the Government's cancer strategy.
It will be used to launch a Glasgow outreach service, targeting groups less likely to attend screening appointments.
Scottish Labour health spokesman Anas Sarwar said: "These figures are utterly shameful - they show that for four years the SNP have failed families across the country, and the performance is getting worse.
"Labour has been arguing for years that if your doctor suspects you have cancer, you should expect to see a specialist and get a diagnosis in two weeks.
"We can only achieve that by fixing the staffing crisis in our NHS."
The cancer statistics were also heavily criticised by the other opposition parties.
Scottish Conservative MSP Donald Cameron said: "It's inexcusable for the SNP to just continually brush these missed targets aside, especially when it's well-known that receiving swift treatment for cancer can often make all the difference in improving outcomes for these patients."
Liberal Democrat Alex Cole-Hamilton said: "It is a disgrace that cancer waiting-time targets have been missed time after time.
"After repeatedly missing this target, ministers need to be clear about what they will do differently in order to meet their commitments to patients in future."
Green MSP Alison Johnstone said: "It's essential we have early diagnosis and treatment of cancer, so the failure to meet waiting times targets four years in a row is deeply concerning.
"The NHS workforce is under huge pressure and we need Scottish ministers to prioritise efforts to recruit and retain additional staff."
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules here