The Scottish Living Wage Accreditation Initiative has been an effective way of boosting the pay packets of low income earners.
Ministers fund the Poverty Alliance to run the Initiative, which encourages employers to pay their staff at least £8.45 an hour. Hundreds of organisations have signed up the scheme.
However, it is incumbent on public bodies to show leadership on paying the Living Wage.
The Scottish Qualifications Authority (SQA), which oversees the country’s exams and assessment system, should be congratulated for being a Living Wage employer.
However, not only does the SQA have staff of its own, but the quango also pays teachers for internal assessment of coursework.
This fee is not a salary add-on: teachers are paid by councils, and the SQA is responsible for picking up the tab on marking payments.
According to the SQA, this fee can be as little as £3.56 per paper for marking internal assessments in subjects such as Computing, which raises questions of whether the system complies with either the minimum or living wages.
There is no definitive answer on how long it takes teachers to mark coursework but anecdotally it can take an hour to assess a single paper in some courses. As such, £3.56 seems a paltry amount that could fall below a minimum threshold.
A Holyrood motion was recently passed which noted that teachers had “lost confidence” in bodies such as Education Scotland and the SQA.
The exams quango must urgently review its payment system to ensure that teachers are not being short-changed.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules here