THOUSANDS of disabled older people could be “fostered” with members of their local community, if councils adopt a radical approach that has been hailed for its potential to fill the gaps left by austerity cuts.
Shared Lives arrangements see people recruited to look after elderly and disabled people in their own homes, as an alternative to day care, for short “respite” breaks or for long-term placements.
There are only 11 such schemes in Scotland, supporting fewer than 400 people. However, experts estimate that, if every council adopted the approach fully, another 3,500 older people could be matched in shared lives arrangements.
Peter Farley’s mother Sheila moved from Stockport to live in Elgin with his family after her husband died five years ago.
When she moved to live with them in Elgin Mr Farley’s relationship with her changed.
“It became carer and cared-for, rather than parent and son,” he said.
Shared Lives has helped Peter and his wife cope. Without it, he believes his mother would be in a home without her twice-weekly breaks with Rosemary Young, who works for Moray Council’s Shared Lives service, which supports about 90 people.
Diane McLeary, the council’s Shared Lives manager, said: “For some relatives it is a huge issue to let go and let your mum walk off with someone they don’t know. But the carers have the luxury of time and build up a relationship of trust with the family.”
Among other benefits, it can help prevent people ending up in care homes, keeping them active and stimulated and easing the strain on relatives and carers, she said.
Ben Hall, of Shared Lives in Scotland, said the approach has been shown to help people live at home for longer, in better health, and therefore could save money. But Scotland is behind the curve. While there are already 12,000 such arrangements in England and Wales.
“There are an estimated 93,000 people with dementia,” he said. “Shared lives schemes can work and support with a lot more people, delivering care in people’s own homes, but we are waiting for a Scottish Government decisions on more support.
“It can fill the gaps where cuts have undermined what councils can offer.”
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules here