SNP ministers have been accused of trying to avoid parliamentary scrutiny by making a rash of statements on controversial issues just as MSPs take a two-week break from Holyrood.
The Scottish LibDems claimed the government was trying to stifle debate by making four ministerial controversies on March 30, the final business day before the Easter recess.
The statements will be on fracking, an overdue mental health strategy, plans to merge Scotland’s enterprise and skills agencies, and health problems associated with vaginal mesh implants.
LibDem MSP Mike Rumbles, who insisted the government set aside two days to debate referendum powers this week, said: “This is an unprecedented move by the Scottish Government who are squeezing in four major ministerial statements in one afternoon.
“This will mean that MSPs will have to wait 18 days until they are able to press SNP ministers further, which is unacceptable.
“All of these statements are incredibly important and people will be suspicious that bundling them together will result in a tsunami of bad news.
“This latest move speaks of a Government that is running scared of proper scrutiny. This timetabling disrespects and undermines the role of Parliament and should not be allowed.”
A spokesman for the First Minister said Mr Rumbles had a cheek.
“It was Mike Rumbles who specifically asked for a two-day debate on an independence referendum, so he can hardly complain about that now – and quite how bringing issues to parliament equates to avoid parliamentary scrutiny, only he can explain.”
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel