LABOUR’s civil war has intensified after Len McCluskey, the General Secretary of the trade union Unite, accused Tom Watson, the party’s deputy leader, of living in a "world of skulduggery, smears and secret plots".
Mr McCluskey’s attack came just hours after Jeremy Corbyn issued a call for unity and followed a poll that put the Conservatives 19 points ahead.
The continuing internal bickering has led Alex Rowley, Scottish Labour’s deputy leader, to accuse the party’s Westminster group of “ripping itself apart” over Mr Corbyn’s leadership and warned of a voter backlash in May’s local elections.
Mr Rowley, who is in charge of Scottish Labour’s council campaign, said: “We need to get our act together and we need unity.”
The Mid-Fife and Scotland MSP added: “I would appeal for unity. These are senior figures within the Labour Party. They’re letting down everybody out there working hard to get Labour elected. We need unity.”
On Monday, Mr Watson warned of a secret plot between Unite and Momentum, the hard Left campaign group that helped propel Mr Corbyn to the party leadership, to take over the party.
This led to a backlash from some Shadow Cabinet colleagues close to Mr Corbyn with one, John McDonnell, the Shadow Chancellor, publicly berating Mr Watson for what he believed was his attempt to influence the current leadership election in Unite, in which Mr McCluskey is seeking re-election as General Secretary.
In a hard-hitting blog for the Huffington Post website, the union leader said he had been touring the country in recent months meeting "decent" workers, who were worried about their jobs, public services and Brexit and that there existed “another world” in the Labour movement.
"A world of skulduggery, smears and secret plots. That is where you will find Tom Watson. When Labour has needed loyalty, he has been sharpening his knife looking for a back to stab. When unity is required, he manufactures division," wrote Mr McCluskey.
The Unite chief, a former flatmate of Mr Watson’s, said he had been accused of being "secretly in cahoots" with Jon Lansman, the founder of Momentum, to bankroll the grassroots activists’ group.
"That was at breakfast. By lunchtime I was no longer the scheming mastermind but Unite chief of staff Andrew Murray was doing the conspiring instead.
"By evening, he may well have been blaming the Unite caretaker for digging a secret tunnel linking Unite HQ to Jon Lansman's home.
"The fact is that I have never had a private meeting with Lansman about anything in my life, let alone on this alleged scheme," insisted Mr McCluskey.
Only Unite's executive could decide to support such an organisation and there was "no proposal that it should do so," he explained.
The union leader added: "Why the untruth? Watson wants to control the Unite election. He is not ready to leave the matter in the hands of the ordinary working people, who make up our union.
"He has been masterminding a nasty tabloid-style campaign against me; standard fare in political elections, alas, but something new for the trade union movement.
"His transparent plan is to install a puppet, who can take the union back to the bad old days when unions like the one he worked for were in the pockets of employers and failed to put their members' interests first."
On Monday night, Mr Corbyn made a fresh plea for unity and acknowledged that "spirits can run high" because Labour was a "passionate party".
The ballot papers for the Unite contest will be sent out later this week; the result will be announced next month.
Christine Shawcroft, a member of Momentum who sits on Labour’s ruling National Executive Council, said Mr Watson was "rather right-wing" and wanted to return to a "command and control" system for running the party based on a "Blairite model".
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel