A doctor who misled other medics before Scottish nurse Pauline Cafferkey was struck down with the Ebola virus is "amazing", a colleague told a tribunal today.
Dr Hannah Ryan was one of the first UK medics to travel to Sierra Leone with Ms Cafferkey and other volunteers to undertake dangerous work helping treat victims of the deadly outbreak that killed thousands in West Africa in 2014.
Another volunteer, Dr Sharon Irvine, told the Medical Practitioners Tribunal Service: "Hannah is amazing. She's one of the best doctors I have worked with ever."
But the tribunal has heard when they returned to the UK Dr Ryan took Ms Cafferkey's temperature while being screened for Ebola and "acquiesced" in not reporting a raised temperature indicative of infection.
Ms Cafferkey was allowed to leave Heathrow Airport but fell seriously ill the next day.
Dr Ryan admits misleading medics from Public Health England (PHE) doing the screening but denies misconduct at the hearing in Manchester.
All the medics had worked in "horrendous" conditions, the tribunal heard, having to wear face masks and heavy, head-to-toe protective clothing in searing heat, working in pairs in case of fainting, while treating women, children and men dying from the virus.
When they got back to the UK on December 28 2014 after two months away they were "keen" to get back home to loved ones.
But the PHE screening process at Heathrow Airport to ensure no one brought the virus back to the UK was "shambolic" with queues building up in the "crowded, noisy and chaotic" quarantined area, the hearing was told.
Dr Ryan took Ms Cafferkey's temperature as 38.2 centigrade - above the 37.5 C threshold as a warning sign for Ebola infection.
Dr Ryan was in a state of "disbelief, fear and panic" at the raised reading and instead of alerting the PHE medics at Heathrow a lower temperature of 37.2C was given.
Dr Ryan denies writing the 37.2C temperature for Ms Cafferkey on the form handed to PHE screening staff at Heathrow.
Instead she admits she "acquiesced" in the wrong temperature being given.
Her counsel, Richard Booth QC, suggested it was another medic, nurse Donna Wood, who had put the false temperature on the form to hand in.
Mr Booth asked Mrs Wood: "Did you say something along the lines of, 'I'm going to write it down as 37.2 and then we will get out of here'?"
Mrs Wood replied: "You are absolutely mistaken, I did not say that."
Mr Booth said she was an experienced nurse and Dr Ryan an inexperienced doctor.
He continued: "At that moment as a very experienced nurse you, in fact, took charge of the situation? You were desperate to get out of the screening area."
She replied: "Absolutely not."
Last year, Mrs Wood was suspended for two months after a Nursing and Midwifery Council (NMC) panel found she had suggested putting the lower temperature on the form.
The NMC said her fitness to practice had been impaired on public interest grounds and her misconduct could have contributed to the risk of Ebola spreading into the UK.
Mrs Wood told Dr Ryan's tribunal today: "Whilst I accept what the NMC's findings were, I don't necessarily agree."
Ms Cafferkey was cleared of allowing the incorrect temperature to be recorded, as her judgment at the airport had been so impaired by the developing illness that she could not be found guilty of misconduct, the NMC ruled.
Dr Ryan's tribunal continues.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article