The Scottish Government's deliberations over a plan to build a major film studio outside Edinburgh will not be hindered by the run up to the local government elections.
During a pre-election period, a "purdah" rule is put in place in which major policy or other announcements are not made.
It was feared by some in the film community that the government's decision to back, or not, the Pentland Studio plan, would be further delayed by the run up to the May 4 local council elections.
Initially, PSL Land Ltd made their planning application for the major studios, on land at Straiton, to Midlothian Council, before the decision was called in by ministers.
However, a Scottish Government spokeswoman said the deliberations over the case would not be hindered by the local elections.
She said: "The Scottish Government is considering a planning application and every effort is being made to issue the decision as soon as possible.
"Government officials only received the Reporters submission on the Pentland’s proposal at the end of December.
"This is a highly complex planning application for a mixed-use development of which a film studio is only one part, and Ministers are currently giving full and proper consideration to it.
"There are many factors to consider that can affect timelines and it would be misleading to suggest an indicative date for decision."
The plan is opposed by the farmer, James Telfer, who currently lives and works on the land in question, and other local residents as well as Green Party MSPs.
She added: "The timing of the planning decision will not be affected by the local government pre-election period."
There are other plans to build a sizeable film studio in Scotland, including an extension of the Wardpark facilities in Cumbernauld and mooted proposition for land near Heriot Watt University, also on the outskirts of Edinburgh.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel