A MERGER between Scotland's largest conservation charity and the government's heritage agency is "almost inevitable", its chief executive has said.
Simon Skinner Simon Skinner, of the National Trust for Scotland (NTS), said that his organisation “occupies the same space” as Historic Environment Scotland (HES), and believes that the two may become one at some point in the future.
NTS has 330,000 members and owns 129 properties across the country, while HES maintains more than 300 sites, including Edinburgh Castle.
Mr Skinner said that both bodies had “a shared agenda”. Speaking to the likelihood of a merger, he added: “Over time, it is almost inevitable. The same space is being occupied and we need to look at that. I think elements of it could come together."
However, he added that it was too early to talk about "synergies and opportunities," saying that NTS had demonstrate its business model was working.
The possibility of a merger has been mooted before, with SNP Ministers considering the proposal a decade ago.
George Reid, the former presiding officer at Holyrood, also conducted a review of NTS in 2010.
A NTS spokesman said: "It is worth noting that NTS is an independent charity with a wider remit than HES as we care for both natural and built heritage."
"Mr Skinner was signalling that nothing should be off limits when considering how best to conserve Scotland’s heritage. The example given was the current negotiations with a commercial partner over potential new management arrangements, interpretation and visitor facilities at Gladstone’s Land in Edinburgh’s Royal Mile."
HES said there were currently no plans to merge the two bodies.
A spokeswoman said: “We have a strong working relationship with colleagues at the National Trust for Scotland on a wide range of matters, such as the current Jacobites campaign and helping to manage and highlight world heritage sites such as St. Kilda, however there are no proposals to change the nature of that relationship.”
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel