SIR John Major has launched a fresh attack on "ultra Brexiteers" within the Conservative Party accusing them of seeking to force a complete break with Europe.
The former Prime Minister said that having won the referendum last year with "fake facts and bogus promise", the "ultras" were now shouting down anyone who expressed an opposing view in a way that was "totally unBritish".
Writing in The Mail on Sunday, he warned if Britain failed to strike a deal with the remaining EU member states and was forced to fall back on World Trade Organisation [WTO] rules - as some hardline Brexit supporters have advocated - it would be "disadvantageous in every way".
Sir John did not name names but his comments will be seen - at least in part - as being aimed at leading Leave campaigners such as Boris Johnson, Michael Gove, Iain Duncan Smith and Jacob Rees-Mogg.
He said the "ultras" were lashing out with "vitriolic and personal attacks" because they were terrified their triumph of taking the country out of Europe would be snatched away and he urged other Brexit supporters to disown them.
"It is time for the minority of 'Ultra Brexiteers' - those who believe in a complete break from Europe - to stop shouting down anyone with an opposing view. It is not only unattractive but profoundly undemocratic and totally un-British," he wrote.
"Instead, they launch vitriolic and personal attacks on the Governor of the Bank of England, judges, civil servants, foreign politicians and other public figures. In doing so, they demean both themselves and their cause.
"If the rancour merely came from rabble elements, or extreme minorities, it could be ignored. But when it comes from politicians, including those from within the governing party, it is time to confront it."
Sir John also dismissed claims by some Brexiteers that Britain could thrive under WTO rules, warning that 90 per cent of UK exports to the EU would become more expensive, with tariffs that would add about £6 billion to their costs.
"It is worth reflecting that those who make such reassuring noises include the very same people who urged the UK to vote Leave on the basis that 'we will be able to give an extra £350 million a week to the NHS'; that 'nobody is talking about threatening our place in the single market'; and that 'there is no prospect of a second Scottish referendum'," he wrote.
"We already know that all three of the above - and much else - were fake facts and bogus promises.
"It was dishonest and wrong to promise the British people an easy, favourable deal with the EU, wrong to promise swift new trade deals, and wrong to state that the Irish peace process would not be unsettled by Brexit."
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel