PRESSURE is mounting to bring executives from Twitter and Facebook before the Scottish Parliament to account for the catalogue of death threats, rape threats, abuse and intimidation on social media.
It follows revelations in the Sunday Herald last week that Nicola Sturgeon and opposition leaders in Scotland have suffered a horrific catalogue of threats and violent online abuse.
Scottish justice secretary Michael Matheson told the Sunday Herald that the social media giants "have a moral responsibility" to protect the public from online abuse and help police catch the aggressive trolls responsible.
He said UK executives from the companies had to "show leadership" as pressure grows on them to appear at Holyrood.
Last night, Matheson branded the abuse a "hate crime" and challenged the American-based social media providers to get to grips with the issue.
Holyrood justice committee member Mary Fee said social media firms should now be summoned to Holyrood.
She warned that social media "has dark corners where misogyny, racism and hatred live and it is right that a light is shone on these areas and action is taken".
The Labour MSP added: “All social media sites must face up to greater accountability for what takes place on their platforms.
"Twitter, Facebook and Google must be willing to come in front of the Scottish Parliament and explain what action they are taking to find and stop abusive accounts.
“We need to see greater co-operation between these sites and Police Scotland to ensure that appropriate action is taken and that we make clear that such abuse is simply unacceptable online.”
Green MSP, Alison Johnstone, echoed the call. She said: “As we continue to head towards an independence referendum it’s essential we keep the online debate as cordial as possible.
"There is also a role for the social media platforms to explain what they can do to curb abuse, while ensuring free speech is not restricted.”
Holyrood's justice committee convenor Margaret Mitchell, a Tory MSP, said: "Online abuse has got to the stage where the big providers have to be held to account. There must be a way of policing the more extreme posts whether it's against politicians or any individual.
"There should be a look at investing in the infrastructure to improve protection as it's become so corrosive for society in terms of mental health and suicide.
"It really needs not just a national solution, not just from one parliament - it's got to be for global organisations to look at, like the UN."
Legislation to regulate the internet remains reserved to Westminster. Both Twitter and Facebook have so far refused to say whether they would appear before MSPs.
Speaking to the Sunday Herald, Matheson said: “There is no excuse for any form of hate crime. It is completely unacceptable for anyone to peddle hatred, abuse or bigotry on-line. There is no such thing as a victimless crime and those who indulge in such cowardly behaviour should be held to account.
“While the legislation in this area is reserved, we support the work of our law enforcement agencies to tackle this issue."
He added: “As we seek to maximise the undoubted benefits of technological advances and greater connectivity, it is essential that all social media companies and ISPs take responsibility and show leadership by constantly reviewing their procedures to tackle unlawful and unacceptable communications.
"They have a moral responsibility to ensure that the people using their services are not needlessly exposed to abuse and continue supporting our law enforcement agencies to pursue those who fail to get the message.”
As the Sunday Herald revealed last week, Police Scotland is investigating a torrent of online abuse against Sturgeon, including death threats, threats of violence and extremely offensive and sexualised insults.
Police yesterday confirmed investigations were still under way into the abuse highlighted. Scottish Labour leader Kezia Dugdale and Scottish Conservative leader Ruth Davidson have also been on the receiving end of online attacks from trolls.
A Twitter spokesperson would not say whether the company's executives would appear before MSPs, but stated it had made a "host of new safety changes" in recent weeks. Facebook declined to comment on the calls for it to appear.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules here