THE SNP is to scale back its defence plans for an independent Scotland.
The party’s defence spokesman Brendan O’Hara said its current policy was “out of date”and had to be refreshed, not least because it was predicated on the UK being in the EU.
The MP told a fringe meeting at SNP conference that plans to keep a population share of UK defence assets would be scaled back to avoid being “saddled” with more than was needed.
The SNP Government’s White Paper for the 2014 referendum proposed a defence budget of £2.5bn after independence, with "air and sea-based patrol" and a total of 15,000 regular and 5,000 reserve personnel within 10 years.
It proposed removal of the Trident nuclear deterrent within four years.
Mr O’Hara, whose Argyll & Bute constituency includes the Faslane nuclear submarine base, said: “One of the big debates we ought to have is what do we do with the military assets? Do we start from scratch? Do we take an eight or nine per cent share of them?
“And if we do take a nine per cent share, what do we take? What are the maintenance contracts? There are a whole load of things.”
He went on: “I personally am very much of the opinion that if we adopt the nine per cent share of hardware then we are pushed down a road from which it is very difficult to come back.
“I don't you think you can have a bespoke independent Scottish defence policy if you are immediately saddled with taking eight, nine per cent of military hardware assets.”
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel