NEARLY four in ten pensioners in Scotland say they would be willing to pay for some non-life threatening treatments, such as cataract and haemorrhoid removal, if the money saved was spent on social care.
A poll by the BMG for the Herald found that 39 per cent of over-65s would back such a move in order to cut costs for the NHS as long as the savings were ring-fenced and used to fund social care.
However, half of of those questioned said they opposed any shift to direct payment, while 12 per cent said they did not know.
The survey was based on a sample of 561 people aged over-65, with SNP voters most likely to oppose payment (61 per cent) while Conservative and LibDem voters were most sympathetic to the idea (51 and 47 per cent respectively).
The model is the norm in other western countries, such as New Zealand, where elective procedures are "scored" in order to decide whether they should be publicly-funded or not, in a form of healthcare rationing. Patients with excluded ailments such as hernias or haemorrhoids can decide whether to go private or pay for the treatment with health insurance.
As our population ages, the key debate rests on how to fund health and social care services as demand increases.
The UK spends 8.5 per cent of its GDP on health and 15 per cent on social care, far short of comparable European countries. Both France and Sweden spend 11 per cent of their GDP on health and 21 per cent on social care.
Even when the comparison is restricted to public sector spending rather total healthcare spending, such as patients paying for private treatment, the UK was spending $2,802 per head in 2013 compared to $4,197 in the US, according to research by the London School of Economics.
However, high spending alone does not necessarily translate into the best outcomes. An acclaimed study, 'The American Healthcare Paradox', noted that despite the US spending 16 per cent of its GDP on healthcare - more than Australia, New Zealand, Canada or any European nation - its health outcomes were generally poorer. The authors concluded that while the US invested in acute hospital care, rehabilitative care, diagnostic imaging, laboratory tests and health insurance, it was being let down by comparatively low GDP spends on education, old age pensions, disability and sickness benefits, unemployment benefits and housing support.
Dr Elizabeth H. Bradley, director of Yale University’s Global Health Leadership Institute, said: "Our study found that countries with high health care spending relative to social spending had lower life expectancy and higher infant mortality than countries that favoured social spending."
The NHS is also hamstrung by a healthcare inflation rate that runs at around 2.5 to three times that of average inflation. The largest costs for most NHS boards, and trusts in England, are staffing, drugs and repaying PFI contracts, in that order.
While there is no consensus from think tanks, health economists, and medical professionals on which healthcare funding model is best, there is consensus that unless we start spending more - or choose to do less.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel