Theresa May has more chance of getting a bad deal or no deal than one as good as the single market in Brexit negotiations, Scotland's First Minister has warned.
Nicola Sturgeon said remaining in the European Union is the "best future" for Scotland, and that a second independence referendum would give people a choice as to whether they wish to accept a "hard Brexit future".
Earlier Holyrood's Brexit minister Mike Russell insisted a fresh independence referendum is now the only way of protecting Scotland from the ''hardest of Brexits''.
Read more: Scotland will exit EU with or without independence, says Theresa May
This week Ms Sturgeon declared she is to seek to hold a second referendum, accusing the Prime Minister of ignoring Scotland over Europe after 62% of people north of the border voted to remain last June.
Speaking on Channel 4 News on Wednesday evening she said: "It is a big decision but it's one that I've taken in what I consider to be in the best interests of Scotland.
"It's all about giving people in Scotland a choice.
"If we don't have the option of a referendum then effectively we are accepting right now a future that is a hard Brexit future with Conservative governments at Westminster for perhaps 20 years or more.
"If people want that then that's fine, they can choose that, but I think it's right that people have a choice given how much is now at stake for our country.
Read more: Scotland will exit EU with or without independence, says Theresa May
"I want Scotland to stay in the EU, that's the long-standing SNP policy.
"What we have to do, as we did in 2014 but now in the different circumstances we face, is, before people are asked to make that choice, set out the process by which we secure our relationship with Europe.
"I've said I want Scotland to be in the European Union, I campaigned for remain, that is why I think that is the best future."
Asked whether she might consider calling off the referendum if Mrs May gets a Brexit agreement as good as the single market, she replied: "I don't think she's going to and I'm not alone in that.
"I think there is more chance of Theresa May getting a bad deal or no deal than there is of getting a deal that is just as good as the single market."
Read more: Scotland will exit EU with or without independence, says Theresa May
Asked if there was anything the Prime Minister could say or do to make her call off the referendum, she said: "I think that has to be for her to decide.
"I have really bust a gut over the past few months trying to reach some kind of common ground and compromise with the Prime Minister.
"All of those efforts have just been hit with this brick wall of intransigence."
Commenting on the timing of the referendum she said it should take place when the terms of Brexit are clear but "before it's too late to choose a different path if that's what we decide".
Earlier on Wednesday Mrs May made clear Scotland would be leaving the EU as a result of the Brexit vote - regardless of whether or not it becomes independent.
Her insistence that Scotland will leave the EU stems from Commission spokesman Margaritis Schinas' statement the ''Barroso doctrine'' continues to apply.
Former commission president Jose Manuel Barroso set out the legal view that if one part of an EU country became an independent state, it would have to apply for EU membership.
At Prime Minister's Questions, Mrs May said: ''Scotland will be leaving the European Union, it will leave the European Union either as a member of the United Kingdom or were it independent, it's very clear with the Barroso doctrine it would not be a member of the European Union.
''What we need now is to unite, to come together as a country and to ensure that we can get the best deal for the whole of the United Kingdom.''
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel