Three-part BBC thriller The Replacement finished on a high as it scored its biggest audience of the series, despite dividing viewers over the ending.
The programme followed the tale of architect Ellen (Morven Christie), who fears her maternity cover Paula (Vicky McClure) is sabotaging her, prompting her to uncover a twisted web of secrets that Ellen suspects was the cause of the gruesome death of her boss.
While Tuesday night’s episode left many fans in the dark due to its sudden resolution, it was a ratings success.
The Replacement (Mark Mainz/BBC/Left Bank)
The hour-long episode was watched by 5.8 million people and had a 27.7% audience share in the 9pm timeslot, according to overnight figures.
The first two episodes had scored five million viewers apiece in the overnights.
These figures do not account for those watching on catch-up service iPlayer.
Tensions reached boiling point in the fast-paced finale of the programme, with some viewers unclear whether Ellen was being paranoid about Paula’s actions after the two underwent a cat and mouse-style scenario.
The Replacement (Mark Mainz/BBC/Left Bank)
The ending saw Paula take Ellen’s newborn baby hostage in an attempt to teach her a lesson about being a good mother, after revealing that her own daughter had died two years before.
But the abrupt conclusion – which included Ellen skilfully hotwiring a car to smash her way out after being locked in by Paula, and Paula owning up to the crime of killing their boss Kay (Neve McIntosh) – saw viewers take to social media to complain about the storyline.
One person commented on Twitter: “The end of The Replacement was soooo disappointing. I’m not happy.”
The end of The Replacement was soooo disappointing. I'm not happy 🙅🏻
— Lauren (@laurenbarnes21) March 14, 2017
The replacement was so so so so good until that ending
— Hen (@Hen_Dobson) March 14, 2017
disappointing ending to the replacement. after all that build up it was such an anti climax
— Alan Brown (@alanbrowwnn) March 14, 2017
Another said: “The replacement was so so so so good until that ending.”
A third viewer agreed: “Disappointing ending to The Replacement, after all that build up it was such an anti climax.”
Pointing out the issues that still seemed unresolved, one person complained: “I don’t get the ending? Did she admit to it all? How did she get found out? #TheReplacement.”
I don't get the ending? Did she admit to it all? How did she get found out? #TheReplacement
— Quote Cocktail (@QuoteCocktail) March 14, 2017
THE REPLACEMENT, round of applause for BBC, what an INTENSE series that was, my blood pressure is highhhhhh
— Z (@zai_swanzy) March 14, 2017
#TheReplacement was nonsensical from start to finish but I liked it!
— Ana M (@anabanana_1000) March 14, 2017
There were positive reviews for the programme, too, as one person enthused: “THE REPLACEMENT, round of applause for BBC, what an INTENSE series that was, my blood pressure is highhhhhh.”
Another added: “#TheReplacement was nonsensical from start to finish but I liked it!”
Some fans have asked for a second series, but the show’s writer Joe Ahearne has said it was intended as a standalone drama.
According to the Radio Times, Ahearne said The Replacement is “very much a self-contained drama”.
He said: “I think it’s quite good to leave people wanting more. And also, I think it would be quite difficult to get those two characters together without either amnesia or plastic surgery.”
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules here