A PROPOSED new kind of British firm has been shelved amid SNP concerns that it could be open to the same criminal abuse as Scottish limited partnerships (SLPs).
The UK Treasury plans to introduce a special corporate vehicle for equity funds with some of the same characteristics as SLPs.
However, a House of Commons committee has asked for the launch of so-called deregulated private fund partnerships (PFLPs) tp be put on hold pending the outcome of a separate and ongoing consultation on reforms to the Scottish firms.
The move comes after Nationalist MP Roger Mullin convinced Conservative and Labour colleagues of the dangers of exposing the new firms to the same risks of abuse as the Scottish equivalents.
The Treasury had announced plans for its PFLPs on the same day that another ministry, the Department for Business, Energy and Industrial Strategy (BEIS), had begun its review of SLPs. The Commons Committee on Regulatory Reform in an official report described this as “not a good example of joined-up government”.
Mr Mullin said: “This report concludes that the Government has not been joined up in dealing with their proposal to create a new type of Limited Partnership. Indeed in the course of recent months I have had to liaise with three departments – Treasury, BEIS and Home – who often were unaware of what others were doing.
“I am pleased that the committee came around to my point of view that this order to create a new type of limited partnership for private fund managers should not proceed until the review of SLPs is completed and lessons drawn.
“This makes sense as we try to prevent such limited partnerships from being exploited by criminals as has too often been the case with SLPs.”
The Herald over the last two years has named scores of SLPs involved in criminal or unethical behaviour, including serious corruption in the former Soviet Union, fronting sites providing child pornography and bootlegged videos and money-laundering.
Security minister Ben Wallace described the revelations in The Herald as “very concerning”
and confirmed they tally with information from law enforcement sources.
SLPs are widely advertised globally as shell companies which can have secret owners, pay no taxes and file no accounts.
However, they are also popular with overseas investors and equity funds as tax-efficient vehicles.
MPs do not oppose this use, nor the similar role envisaged for the new PFLPs.
Andrew Bridgen, who chairs the committee, described the Treasury proposals as “essential”.
But he added: “The Government’s timing has been unfortunate, with the Treasury putting the plans forward on the same day that BEIS launched its consultation.
“It would be sensible for ministers to only proceed once they have received convincing assurances from the consultation that there are no wider issues to address.”
Mr Mullen first raised concerns about PFLPs in The Herald’s Agenda column.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel