THE Palace of Westminster is in danger of a “catastrophic failure” unless ministers bring forward a major renovation programme as a matter of urgency, a committee of MPs has warned.
The Commons Public Accounts Committee backed a plan for a “full decant” of the building – home to the Houses of Parliament – with MPs and peers moving out for a period of about six years while the work is carried out at an estimated cost of £3.5 billion to £3.9bn.
The committee said the proposal put forward last year by a joint committee of the House of Commons and the House of Lords represented the “most economical, effective and efficient” option for restoring the palace to a proper state.
As a Unesco world heritage site, the committee stressed that ultimate responsibility for taking action lay with the Treasury while further “delay and indecision” would add to the final cost.
It said: “This internationally recognised building is in a state of extreme disrepair. The risk of a catastrophic failure is high and growing with every month that passes. It must be repaired. For a world heritage site that is the home of the ‘mother of parliaments’, doing nothing is not an option.
“The best value for money will be achieved by getting on with it. The Government should not delay any further in putting the proposal for a decision in principle before both Houses.”
The position however is complicated by the decision of another committee of MPs – the Commons Treasury Committee to conduct its own inquiry into the renovation plan.
Launching the inquiry in January, the committee chairman Andrew Tyrie said the original joint committee proposal and the consultants’ report on which it was based did not provide sufficient evidence to make even a “preliminary decision” on the way forward.
But with the Treasury Committee yet to begin hearings on the issue, Public Accounts Committee chairman Meg Hillier warned they could not afford further hold-ups.
“Delaying a decision on how that work should be carried out will only add to the costs and risks,” she said.
“The longer the House of Commons spends mulling new or alternative options, the greater the chance that public money is wasted.”
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel