THE average cost to the British taxpayer of a peer in the House of Lords is £83,000 a year, official figures have revealed.
The data released in a parliamentary written answer showed the overall bill for the unelected upper chamber in the last financial year, excluding building costs, stood at £67,932,000.
Based on there being 814 members at the time, this equated to £83,000 each.
The statistics come amid criticism of the size of the House of Lords compared with the Commons, which usually has 650 elected MPs.
A cross-party group of peers is currently looking at ways to reduce their number following concerns about the upper chamber’s “over-bloated” image and claims that it detracted from its role in scrutinising and debating legislation.
READ MORE: Michelle Mone treats billionaire boyfriend to unique birthday surprise
The Lords was also the focus of recent controversy with the broadcast of a BBC fly-on-the-wall documentary in which a former lord speaker said many peers contributed “absolutely nothing” to Parliament and claimed one member kept a taxi running outside while signing in to collect the £300 daily allowance.
In a parliamentary written question to the senior deputy speaker, Ukip peer Lord Pearson of Rannoch asked “What is the average cost to the British taxpayer, including salary and expenses but excluding building maintenance costs, of a member of the House of Lords”.
Responding, Lord McFall of Alcluith wrote: “For the 2015-16 financial year the cost of the House of Lords excluding Estates and Works expenditure and non-cash costs (e.g. depreciation) was £67,932,000. As at 31 March 2016 there were 814 members, making the average cost of a member on this basis £83,000.”
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel