US President Donald Trump appeared to reinforce his campaign support for the continued use of Guantanamo Bay, decrying the release of detainees who returned to the battlefield.
The tweet was the first time Mr Trump had mentioned the detention centre since he took office.
He said: "122 vicious prisoners, released by the Obama Administration from Gitmo, have returned to the battlefield. Just another terrible decision!".
While the tweet pins the blame on the wrong president - the bulk of detainees who returned to the fight were released under then-President George W Bush - it also suggests that Mr Trump has not given up on the idea that Guantanamo should remain an active facility.
122 vicious prisoners, released by the Obama Administration from Gitmo, have returned to the battlefield. Just another terrible decision!
— Donald J. Trump (@realDonaldTrump) March 7, 2017
There has been no recent discussion of the draft executive order that surfaced shortly after Mr Trump took office. The draft, which was obtained by the Associated Press, endorsed the continued use of Guantanamo to hold enemy combatants including those from al Qaida, the Taliban and the Islamic State group.
During his campaign, Mr Trump said he not only wanted to keep the detention centre open, but "load it up with some bad dudes". He returned to that thought in an early January tweet, calling for an end to detainee releases, insisting that dangerous people should not be allowed back on the battlefield.
READ MORE: Chancellor will hail £350m Budget bonus for Scotland as "benefits of Union in action"
Asked on Tuesday about the status of the executive order, the White House declined to comment or say if one is in the works. When the draft leaked out in January, the White House said it was not official.
Commanders at Guantanamo have made clear that if needed they have the space and ability to take on more detainees. At its height in 2003 the facility held about 680 prisoners.
"I'm confident that I will get a little more notice than 'there is a plane in the air that's going to land in four hours' or whatever the case may be. The few days, if that's all I have, will be adequate for me to receive a small number of detainees," said Rear Admiral Peter J Clarke, the commander at the detention centre.
There is immediate room available for 150 prisoners in Camp 6, as well as about 80 cells in the adjacent Camp 5, where the military is building a new detainee medical clinic. There is also unused space encircled by razor wire and empty guard towers in nearby Camp Delta.
The US, however, has not been capturing a large number of prisoners as it did in the early days of the wars in Afghanistan and Iraq, so it is not clear where the Trump administration would find many new people to put in Guantanamo.
Former President Barack Obama had promised to shut down the facility and had pressed the Defence Department to get more of the detainees transferred out to other nations.
There were 201 transfers during his eight years in office, and the 41 detainees who now remain include 10 who are facing criminal charges and five who are currently eligible for transfer.
The Obama White House and human rights groups argued that Guantanamo was a waste of money and a "recruiting tool" for terrorists.
READ MORE: Chancellor will hail £350m Budget bonus for Scotland as "benefits of Union in action"
Mr Obama called for a plan to close the facility and transfer the remaining detainees to a prison in the United States.
The plan, which considered more than a dozen locations in the US and laid out potential construction costs of up to 475 million dollars (£389 million), hit a wall of opposition from Congress, which passed a law prohibiting the transfer of Guantanamo detainees to America.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules here