ONE in four tenants has deductions taken from their deposit when they leave but almost all successfully claim the cash back, a study has found.
The first annual survey of the money deducted by landlords from tenants’ deposits when leases end also found variations in the behaviour of tenants.
It was found Aberdeen tenants are good at paying their rent and looking after the decor, Edinburgh tenants can be trusted not to trash a property’s soft furnishings and Dumfries tenants are worst at paying rent at the end of a lease.
But in terms of tidiness the worst area in Scotland is Stirling, where more than half of tenancies end with properties needing cleaned.
READ MORE: Gardener who earned thousands in illegal code-sharing scheme scam tagged
The findings are included from SafeDeposits Scotland, a Glasgow-
based organisation and Scotland’s largest tenancy deposit scheme, holding almost 60 per cent of all private rental deposits, worth over £75 million.
It reviewed a total of 83,812 deposit repayments made over the last year, with a value of £35.6m, and discovered significant differences around Scotland regarding the reasons for deductions being made from deposits.
Deductions were made from 82 per cent of deposits and of this number 98 per cent returned to tenants without the need to go to adjudication, where deductions had been agreed by landlord and tenant.
Victoria Nixon, operations manager of SafeDeposits Scotland, said: “As we look after the majority of tenancy deposits in Scotland we have a vast amount of data regarding the Scottish private rental sector.
“Looking at how landlords around the country have made deductions gives a fascinating insight into the rental market and, perhaps, the differences between us as Scots.”
Data was analysed for tenancies in Inverness, Aberdeen, Dundee, Edinburgh, Stirling, Glasgow and Dumfries.
Tenants in Dumfries were bottom of the list at looking after the decor of rented properties, with eight per cent of deposits in that area seeing deductions made due to remedial redecoration work. At 1.92 per cent Aberdeen was best.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules here