AN SNP local election candidate whose business website claimed he was a direct descendent of George III has announced he will not contest the poll.
Stephen Brown, a businessman and treasurer at Citizens Advice Scotland, has said he would not stand as a Nationalist on May 4 on health grounds.
The Herald revealed last week how had purchased the title Lord Glencoe for £30 and calling himself Lord Yerton on his site his site stated his lineage to the Hanoverian monarch had "recently been verified by DNA analysis".
The move also comes on the back of his decision to quit social media following a row with a pro-Union tweeter where he suggested his opponent on a long-running spat should emigrate.
He had been selected to contest the Dalry and West Kilbride ward in North Ayrshire.
In a statement, Mr Brown said: "Regrettably I have withdrawn from running in the NAC campaign due to health reasons.
"I am aware that the other parties who can only get publicity by quoting me completely out of context, will attempt to make political capital from this, but I am in the unenviable position of taking the doctor’s instructions beyond any party political line."
Mr Brown had previously claimed his laird credentials had been a joke with friends but there re-emergence following his selection had triggered political concerns and some local mockery.
One local source had told The Herald that it was preferable that issue had emerged before rather than after the election and raised questions over how Mr Brown had cleared SNP selection hurdles.
When asked about the royalty claims and Twitter comments Mr Brown said he was was a suitable candidate on the basis of his professional and personal background, adding the social media comments came on the back of right-wing attacks.
An SNP spokesman said “We have just been advised by Stephen that he is standing down for health reasons, and we wish him well in his recovery.
"In terms of the vacancy that this leaves, it will be for his local branch to consider whether it wishes to fill this in the coming weeks.”
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel