PEOPLE suffering a cardiac arrest fare worse in the UK than abroad because bystanders are less willing to attempt cardiopulmonary resuscitation, a new report suggests.
Data shows that members of the public who witness a cardiac arrest in the UK perform CPR in fewer than four out of 10 cases.
This compares with rates of almost three-quarters in Norway, where survival rates are up to three times as high.
READ MORE: Row over Galloway's Viking hoard deepens
Every minute without CPR or resuscitation using a defibrillator cuts a person’s chance of survival by around 10 per cent.
After 10 minutes without CPR or defibrillation, a person has a two per cent chance of survival.
Defibrillators are now stationed across the UK in public places, including shopping centres and supermarkets.
They can be used by any member of the public to deliver an electric shock to the heart when someone is having a cardiac arrest and can boost survival significantly. A report from the British Heart Foundation (BHF) has revealed that 60,000 cardiac arrests occur out of hospital every year across the UK.
The charity wants to raise awareness among the public that survival chances can be increased to up to 40 per cent through the early use of CPR and defibrillators.
Its report, Resuscitation To Recovery, says that simply waiting for the emergency services to arrive means lives are lost that could be saved.
It also calls for all pupils in secondary schools to learn CPR.
READ MORE: Row over Galloway's Viking hoard deepens
Professor Sir Nilesh Samani, medical director at the BHF, said: “There is potential to save thousands of lives but we urgently need to change how we think about cardiac arrest care.
“It’s clear that we need a revolution in CPR by educating more people in simple lifesaving skills and the use of external defibrillators, and for the subsequent care of a resuscitated patient to be more consistent and streamlined.”
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article