NICOLA Sturgeon’s education reforms have been “kicked into the long grass” as ministers drown in a sea of consultations instead of delivering results, opposition parties have claimed.
In heated scenes at First Minister’s Questions, Ms Sturgeon strongly denied the charges, but conceded her government still had “so much more work to do”.
The Conservatives and Labour levelled the criticism after John Swinney delayed publication of his flagship Education Bill from this week to “sometime during 2017”.
The Education Secretary said he needed time to “chew over” around 1100 consultation responses to a review of school governance, which will inform the Bill.
Scottish Tory leader Ruth Davidson said that despite Ms Sturgeon making education and closing the attainment gap her top priority, it was clear reform was “on the slow train”.
She said: “A year-and-a-half ago, the First Minister staked her reputation on reforming Scotland's schools and what have we seen since then?
"We've seen literacy standards slipping, we've seen numeracy standards sliding, we've seen Curriculum for Excellence failing, and now we've seen her Education Secretary stalling.
"She keeps putting their referendum on the front foot but she's putting everyone else's child's education on the back burner.
"Hasn't her Government got their priorities all wrong on this?"
Ms Sturgeon said: "Every time Ruth Davidson stands up in this chamber all she manages to do is shoot herself in the foot.
“I want to talk about education and she just continually tries to shoehorn in the mentions of independence and a referendum.
“It's right and proper that the Education Secretary considers all of those responses and then comes forward to Parliament with our proposals on the way forward."
The First Minister said the governance review was one part of education reform, alongside the attainment challenge, pupil equity funding and national improvement framework.
Scottish Labour leader Kezia Dugdale said the Education Bill was part of a wider pattern of government inertia, noting ministers had launched 121 consultations since last May.
She said: “The Education Secretary has kicked the consultation on how schools are run into the long grass. The Education Bill, the very symbol of this Government's apparent number one priority - it has been kicked into the long grass too.
"Education was the First Minister's defining mission. Isn't it the case that education is defining this Government as indecisive and distracted?"
Ms Sturgeon called Ms Dugdale a “pound shop Ruth Davidson”.
The Labour leader said that was “beneath her—it is what we expected of Alex Salmond, not what we expect of the First Minister who is committed to closing the [attainment] gap.”
Ms Dugdale went on: “The Government has launched more than 120 consultations and reviews, which is three a week. The enterprise review alone has three reviews within it and the health and social care delivery plan has another four reviews within it.
“There is even a review into the review of fracking. That might make sense if this were a new government, but this SNP Government has been in place for 10 years.
“I know the First Minister has only one thing on her mind, but when is she going to stop talking about governing and actually start doing some governing?”
Ms Sturgeon said she would “never stop talking to, engaging with and consulting the people of Scotland” and said Labour’s failure to the same had ruined it electorally.
Green MSP Patrick Harvie questioned whether there was enough support in schools for the quarter of pupils identified as having additional support needs.
Ms Sturgeon said: “If the Government needs to take further action, I will work with the education secretary to make sure that we do that.”
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel