POLICE Scotland has still not integrated any of its back office functions almost four years after it was meant to make policing more efficient, the head of its oversight board has admitted.
John Foley, chief executive of the Scottish Police Authority (SPA), said the force was still using “17 or 18” different payroll systems, despite Scotland’s eight regional forces merging in 2013.
He also admitted the SPA had been paying a PwC accountant £950 a day since June in an attempt to get to grips with Police Scotland’s runaway £1.1bn budget.
The Auditor General for Scotland, who has issued three annual reports criticising the force’s “weak” financial management, recently warned it faced a £188m deficit by 2020/21.
Taking evidence from the SPA and Chief Constable Phil Gormley in light of the warnings, Holyrood’s Public Audit Committee heard the failure to streamline the legacy systems of the eight former forces had contributed to the financial problems.
SNP MSP Colin Beattie asked if "any actual back office function that has been successfully integrated since the police merger?"
Mr Foley said: "In terms of a function being completely integrated, in my view, no they haven't."
He denied it was an "act of desperation" to bring in a £950-a-day accountant when the force’s own budget was under such strain.
He said: “We're getting good value from the point of view that we need to have someone who is experienced and knows what they're doing. The risk of not having that is much greater.
“We're not pretending that the finance function is anything other than in a difficult place and so we need to have someone with the appropriate skills and experience to lead that."
He said the force was recruiting a permanent chief financial officer, who should start in April
SPA chair Andrew Flanagan denied the force was in "a state of crisis", as SNP committee member Alex Neil recently suggested, but admitted the situation was "clearly challenging".
He told MSPs the finance team had been working with legacy systems that had not been rationalised and streamlined into a single system following merger.
"The issue wasn't only competency of the staff, it was when we were being asked questions of detail it was very difficult for them to dig down into the legacy information that they had and bring forward sensible consolidated responses," Mr Flanagan said.
Like Mr Foley, he said back office systems like pay and HR had still not been integrated, and said a decision had been made after the merger to focus on operational policing instead.
But he insisted the force was now "on the right path", and referred to this week’s publication of a 10-year strategy, which set out plans to slow officer recruitment.
Police Scotland Deputy chief officer David Page also admitted the force’s use of police officers to perform backroom duties after thousands of civilian staff were let go was a “false economy”.
Since the merger, the first SPA chair Vic Emery and first Chief Constable Sir Stephen House, who fought a damaging turf war in the force’s early days, have both left.
Asked whether the financial situation was a threat to policing in Scotland, Chief Constable Gormley said: “I think we've got a plan to deal with it. I think it's a challenge, of course it is and if we don't deliver on the plan then it will start to impact on our operational capability, but I'm completely confident we'll meet that challenge."
Committee convener Jenny Marra said: “It’s unacceptable that we’re still discussing financial and leadership failures at Police Scotland almost four years since it was established.
“The SPA and Police Scotland have accepted it is vital their transformation plan finally deals with long-standing weaknesses around financial planning, leadership and transparency. Their efforts to reduce a projected £188m funding gap must not affect public safety in any way.”
LibDem Liam McArthur said his party’s warnings against centralising the police had been borne out by “a litany of failures” at Police Scotland the SPA.
He said: “There is little sign of the cost-saving back office consolidations that ministers offered as the justification for their misguided power grab.”
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel