HOSPITALS are spending as little as 94 pence on patient meals, with many health boards cutting costs by buying in cheaper meat, fish, fruit and vegetables from abroad.
The details emerged in under a freedom of information request by the BBC.
NHS Grampian spent £3.50 per day which it said broke down as 94p for each of the two main meals and £1.62 for snacks and drinks. It also sourced 50 per cent of its frozen food from overseas last year and 40 per cent of the products in its chilled food contract also came from abroad.
Professor Mike Lean, chair of human nutrition at Glasgow University, said: "There must be a lower limit below which quality will be sacrificed in a variety of ways.
"Meal quality has a number of elements: it has to look good, taste good, texture must be good and it has a biological importance - so it must be nutritionally good."
Daily spending on meals in other health boards ranged from £2.80 to £3.40 per day in Dumfries and Galloway £2.80 to £3.40, £3.18 by NHS Borders, £3.20 by NHS Ayrshire and Arran to £6.82 in NHS Shetland.
Health boards said food was purchased via national procurement contracts to get the best deals possible, and that low costs did not necessarily reflect poor quality.
NHS Lothian stressed that its cheapest meals were served at St John's Hospital but the kitchen was "widely recognised for the high quality meals" provided.
The most recent Scottish Care Experience Survey found that 18 per cent of patient were not happy with the food they had received
The FOI also revealed that 12 out of 14 health boards said they were importing chicken from Thailand and carrots from Belgium.
Public Health Minister Aileen Campbell said: "We have a set of very rigorous nutritional guidelines that we expect all boards to adhere to.
"There will be differences in terms of price but we do expect that the nutritional guidelines will be adhered to."
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel