Shirley MacLaine says she is “processing the horror” of the Oscar best picture gaffe involving her younger brother Warren Beatty.
The 82-year-old actress was in the audience at the Dolby Theatre when La La Land was mistakenly named winner of the award instead of Moonlight.
Shirley, who had presented best foreign language film, said she tried to call her brother, 79, after the show but he did not answer his phone.
Charlize Theron and Shirley MacLaine at the Oscars (Chris Pizzello/AP)
She told USA Today: “I think we’re all processing the horror of it. I’m still dealing with it.
“I’m concerned with how (Warren) must have felt being so close to him.
“I’m three years older and I’m protective. We know how difficult it was for him, but it was also for me.”
After failing to reach Warren, Shirley spoke to his wife, actress Annette Bening, but declined to reveal details of their conversation.
La La Land producer Jordon Horowitz, Warren Beatty and Jimmy Kimmel during the Oscars mix-up (Chris Pizzello/AP)
She said it would be “wonderful” if Warren was asked to hand out the best picture award at next year’s Oscars to make up for the error.
“The one thing you learned about what occurred at the Oscars is that every instant of life is important,” Shirley added.
“And anything like that can happen to you, driving in a car, leading a seminar, working at your desk and presenting an award.”
Shirley MacLaine (Matt Sayles/Invision/AP)
Warren, who presented the award alongside his Bonnie And Clyde co-star Faye Dunaway, was given the card for actress in a leading role rather than the best picture winner.
After the ceremony, he urged the organisers of the Oscars to “publicly clarify” the reasons for the envelope mix-up which led to the highest-profile fiasco in the ceremony’s history.
Academy president Cheryl Boone Isaacs has since said two accountants, Brian Cullinan and Martha Ruiz, who were responsible for the error will never work at the Oscars again.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel