A SHADOWY group of business leaders who funnelled more than £400,000 through the Democratic Unionist Party in Northern Ireland to support the Brexit campaign are prepared to bankroll opposition to Scottish independence if a second referendum is called.
The Constitutional Research Council (CRC) reportedly used a loophole in election laws to keep the donors' identities hidden. By channelling the money though the DUP – where because of perceived security threats in Northern Ireland donors can remain anonymous – they escaped having to declare contributions, as they would have had to do in Scotland, England and Wales.
The CRC is chaired by former vice-chairman of the Scottish Conservative Party Richard Cook. It has already said it would be willing to donate to a positive pro-union campaign in a second independence referendum.
DUP MP Sir Jeffrey Donaldson said: "It [CRC] has been involved in Scotland, for example supporting unionism in Scotland, and it approached the DUP to support our campaign during the referendum because it supports unionist causes in the United Kingdom."
The DUP has been under mounting pressure to reveal the name of the donor which enabled it to promote its Leave message on a UK-wide basis, including the purchase of a four-page Vote To Leave EU advert in the British Metro newspaper – a publication not circulated in Northern Ireland.
The leader of the cross-community Alliance Party, Naomi Long, said questions remained over the DUP's Brexit expenditure.
She said the party should release a detailed breakdown of how the money was spent. "Would the DUP have campaigned as vigorously for Brexit had they not received a large donation to do so?" she said.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules here