BUSINESS leaders who have pledged to fund a defence of the union in any future independence referendum are warning about the dangers of running another Project Fear: the Refrightening campaign.
Richard Cook, the chairman of the Constitutional Research Council (CRC) and a former vice chairman of the Scottish Conservatives, has told how the “prudent and responsible thing to do is to plan” for a re-run of the September 2014 vote.
Yesterday’s Herald revealed how the CRC – which includes several unnamed Scottish business leaders – were the mystery donors behind a £400,000 Brexit fund handed to Northern Ireland’s Democratic Unionist Party.
Despite mounting pressure, the DUP leader Arlene Foster had always refused to identify the donors.
The money paid for a controversial £282,000 advert in the Metro newspaper just days before Brexit vote, even though the paper is not circulated in Northern Ireland.
Today, Mr Cook said that by mounting a campaign to save the union his group could be accused of acknowledging that “a second IndyRef is inevitable.
But he called for Unionists to “learn the lessons of the past” and plan for a “better Better Together”.
He said that the real lesson of the 2014 campaign was “campaign for the Union, not against independence”, adding: “The last thing we want our side to be is Project Fear: the Refrightening.
He also reiterates his view that “Brexit would be good for the Union, and correspondingly bad for nationalism”, despite Nicola Sturgeon putting another vote “on the table” in the wake of the result.
He adds: “The end of amateurism is now: the Union deserves nothing less than our best effort.”
CRC sources estimate that they bankrolled 95 per cent of the DUP’s £425,000 Brexit campaign spend.
But its initial target, the official Vote Leave campaign, had reached its donation cap and could not accept any more cash, so they gave to the DUP instead.
Because of the Troubles, the names of donors to political parties in Northern Ireland are kept confidential amid claims they could face reprisals if they were identified.
CRC sources said that those who had given to the Brexit fund did not want to be identified because of concerns about being seen to give money to a Northern Irish party.
They said all were British Nationals able to vote in UK elections and compliant with criteria set out by the elections watchdog, the Electoral Commission. But Sinn Fein’s Conor Murphy said that the donation “made a mockery” of the DUP’s own calls for transparency in politics before next week’s Stormont Assembly elections. “It is still not clear who is in the group .. and what the group got in return for this huge donation,” he said.The leader of the cross-community Alliance Party, Naomi Long, also called for full transparency. “so that people can make their own judgment as to whether parties are acting on their behalf as the electorate or on behalf of those with deep pockets and fat wallets.”
The SNP, meanwhile, accused the group of harming Scotland by backing Brexit.
SNP MSP James Dornan said: “Any future anti-independence campaign will be tainted by being bankrolled by a group who deliberately undermined Scotland’s interests and long-term economic wellbeing to defend the Union at all costs.”
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel