DAVID Mundell has explicitly ruled out a key element of Nicola Sturgeon’s proposal to keep Scotland in the EU single market after Brexit, increasing the chance of a second referendum.
The Scottish Secretary said the UK Government would not devolve immigration, meaning Scotland could not have the freedom of movement which is integral to the single market.
Published in December, the First Minister’s plan said Scotland could have a Norway-style membership of the single market, but only if major new powers were devolved to Holyrood.
Read more: Political legend George Reid returns to frontline politics over Brexit
If Scotland was “in the single market – upholding the principle of free movement of people – and the rest of the UK is not… Scotland would require powers over immigration to be devolved,” it stated.
Ms Sturgeon said another referendum was “all but inevitable” if the plan was rejected.
However speaking to the media at Holyrood after giving evidence to MSPs on Brexit, Mr Mundell said UK and Scottish officials were looking at smaller-scale alternatives around immigration, such as helping Scotland get the right seasonal workers for agriculture.
He said that if the SNP wanted to attract more people it shouldn’t make Scotland the highest taxed part of the UK, a reference to the 2017-18 Budget making high earners pay £400 more income tax in Scotland than England.
Read more: Political legend George Reid returns to frontline politics over Brexit
He said: “We are not minded... to having a Scotland-specific immigration policy.”
He said UK and Scottish government officials had set up a workstream “to look at whether there are other ways of… encouraging people to Scotland which are not at heart either current freedom of movement within the EU or devolving immigration.”
He denied this meant Ms Sturgeon’s plan for a differentiated deal was dead in the water, as the two governments were still talking.
However he added: “What we’re clear on is that we’re not minded to devolve migration, that’s why we’ve set up this workstream, that we can look at other ways we can look at the migration issue, other than the traditional freedom of movement within the European single market.”
On tax, he added: “Of the people who come into the United Kingdom at this moment, only 4 per cent of those people end up in Scotland. The Scottish Government has many powers and responsibilities to encourage people to Scotland.
Read more: Political legend George Reid returns to frontline politics over Brexit
“Making Scotland the highest taxed part of the United Kingdom is not necessarily the way to attract medical professionals to come to Scotland.
"There are lots of powers and responsibilities they have that would make Scotland more attractive for people to come to, and that is one of the issues that they need to focus on, rather than simply saying it’s about having the power over immigration policy.
“Everyone accepts that we want people to come to Scotland and part of that is making Scotland an attractive place to come to. I don’t think that’s by having higher taxes than elsewhere in the UK for example. "Because the other thing that Scotland relies on is people coming from elsewhere in the UK, and we certainly don’t want to be putting in place any impediments which would impact on people coming here from other parts of the UK.”
Mr Mundell, Scotland’s only Tory MP, appeared to accept Scotland was on the cusp of another referendum, urging Ms Sturgeon to take the issue off the table “even at this late, late hour”.
Asked to explain the remark, he said: “In this process, as it has proceeded, we have gone from very to very very to very very very very likely. I mean, I don’t know how likely very very likely is.
“My call to Nicola Sturgeon today remains that it [a referendum] should be taken off the table.”
A Scottish Government source said: “Our compromise proposals, including transfer of immigration powers to Holyrood, have not so far been met by an equal compromise by the UK Government’s, whose response has failed to live up to their rhetoric of equal partnership.”
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel