Thousands of protesters gathered outside Parliament as MPs debated Donald Trump's state visit to Britain.
In a packed Westminster Hall, MPs were considering Theresa May's decision to extend the invitation to the US president in a debate being held in response to petitions signed by millions of Britons.
Anti-Trump chants were heard from Parliament Square before the debate, and appeared to die down as Labour MP Paul Flynn opened proceedings.
MPs were debating a petition signed by more than 1.85 million people, calling for the visit to be stripped of the trappings of a state occasion in order to avoid causing "embarrassment" to the Queen.
They were also considering an alternative petition, backed by almost 312,000 signatories, demanding the state visit goes ahead.
Mr Flynn highlighted the fact that Mr Trump is only the third US president to be given the honour of a state visit and said he was invited too soon in his already highly controversial presidency.
Barack Obama only received an invitation after 758 days, while it took 978 days before his predecessor, George W Bush, was offered a state visit, compared with seven days for Mr Trump.
Mr Flynn repeated comments made by former Foreign Office permanent secretary Lord Ricketts, who said the Queen has now been put in a "very difficult position".
Photo credit: PA
The Labour veteran added: "I believe for that reason alone that we should consider this, and the Government should consider this with a bit of humility... and change the invitation to one for a visit, not a state visit."
In its official response to the petitions, the Government stressed ministers believe "the President of the United States should be extended the full courtesy of a State Visit".
"We look forward to welcoming President Trump once dates and arrangements are finalised," the response said.
Mr Flynn also compared the US president's behaviour to a "petulant child" as he encouraged ministers to avoid making the mistakes of the past when "very unsavoury characters" have received invitations for state visits.
During the debate, SNP MP Alex Salmond noted: "The question of the seven-day invitation - would you interpret desperation as the reason?
"And if you're able to see desperation for a trade deal, do you think that President Trump might be able to detect it as well?"
Photo credit: PA
Mr Flynn replied: "The word comes to mind when we think of the circumstances of our beleaguered Prime Minister."
The former Scottish first minister said the US president is "not a stupid man", adding it is a "recipe for total and utter disaster" for the UK to advertise its weak position to Mr Trump.
The Stop Trump coalition called a nationwide day of action and dozens of protests were co-ordinated by the One Day Without Us movement celebrating the contribution of immigrants to British society.
Celebrities backing the action included singer Paloma Faith, who said: "I'm backing the protests because I believe in human rights and compassion and Trump evidently does not."
Calls for the state visit to be cancelled have been backed by London mayor Sadiq Khan, who hit out at the president's "cruel and shameful" policies.
Mr Khan said the controversial tycoon's travel ban aimed at people from seven Muslim-majority countries, which has run into trouble in the US courts, and the suspension of refugee admissions were reasons not to be "rolling out the red carpet".
Commons Speaker John Bercow has also become embroiled in the row after effectively banning Mr Trump from addressing MPs and peers during his visit.
A motion of no confidence in the Speaker was tabled as MPs left for the February recess, but with Parliament returning on Monday both Mr Bercow's critics and supporters will be seeking allies.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel