A FAILED recruitment drive to find a new chief executive to run Scotland’s largest health board has cost taxpayers up to £50,000.
NHS Greater Glasgow and Clyde confirmed it paid recruitment consultancy, Gatenby Sanderson, “up to £50,000” to find a replacement for Robert Calderwood, who had been expected to retire in January.
The health board declined to confirm exactly how much had been paid to the firm.
However, none of the shortlisted candidates who went forward to interview were hired and a second recruitment drive, led internally by NHS Scotland’s own human resources department, has now been launched.
Mr Calderwood has been asked to remain in post until the end of next month while the search for his replacement continues.
Scottish Liberal Democrat health spokesman Alex Cole-Hamilton said: “Spending £50,000 on recruitment consultants who have clearly failed at their job is £50,000 that is not being spent on patient care.”
Anas Sarwar, Labour health spokesman, added: “With services facing closure or downgrading, people will rightly think this is money that could be better spent on patient care.”
A spokeswoman for the health board said: “The board sought an executive search company to support its recruitment of a new chief executive. Gatenby Sanderson was the successful company both on quality and value for money.
“Following an unsuccessful recruitment process we have begun a second recruitment process and are confident an appointment will be made shortly.”
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules here