Detailed MRI scans could help improve the recovery of patients with liver cancer, researchers believe.
A £1.1million initiative is to study the use of advanced imaging technology in assessing possible risks to patients before surgery.
Doctors typically remove the section of the liver that is affected by cancer and leave the remainder of the organ intact which needs to function well enough for the patient to survive.
A University of Edinburgh and Hampshire Hospitals NHS Foundation project, called HepaT1ca, is working with Perspectum Diagnostics, which has developed the technology called LiverMultiScan.
It is said the system can safely and accurately identify poor liver health caused by excessive fat, inflammation, scar tissue or high iron content.
Previous research into surgical complications has identified poor liver health, caused by pre-existing chronic liver disease, as a key contributor to post-operation liver failure.
Lead researcher Damian Mole, who is based at the University of Edinburgh, said: "We believe that these techniques can measure liver health prior to surgery and therefore contribute to a more accurate assessment of surgical risk.
"Ultimately, we hope this enabling technology will significantly improve the safety of patients who undergo surgery."
Surgery is thought to be the most effective treatment for liver tumours with around 1,600 operations performed in the UK each year.
Myrddin Rees, of Hampshire Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, said: "The opportunity to extend surgery to more patients with primary and secondary tumours is thwarted by our inability to accurately quantify the function of the remaining liver.
"This is an exciting opportunity to fill this gap in our knowledge."
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules here