The cost of removing the time limit for victims of childhood abuse to seek civil damages in court may have been underestimated, MSPs have been told.
Police Scotland has warned the impact of the Limitation (Childhood Abuse) (Scotland) Bill could be much higher than expected.
Holyrood's Justice Committee is examining the proposed legislation, which would remove the current three-year time bar, or limitation, for bringing a civil court claim for damages in some cases of childhood abuse.
Financial documents published alongside the Bill estimate the change in the law would result in about 2,200 claims in the courts initially.
In a written submission to the committee, Police Scotland reiterated its support for the Bill but added it estimated the force held at least 5,000 files dating back to 1964 relating to reports of child abuse and neglect "within an institution or care setting or involving a person of public prominence".
The force said: "As such, Police Scotland is of the opinion that the reference point is a conservative estimate and the impact on the Scottish courts may be more significant that suggested in the financial memorandum.
"Police Scotland would suggest that there is opportunity to further scope the Bill"s financial impact."
The submission said the legislation was likely to have "significant resource (human and financial) implications" for the force and a "far-reaching impact" on individuals, groups and organisations.
The concern was echoed by the Association of British Insurers, which said the 2,200 estimate "fails to take into account the potential effect of the Bill in encouraging more cases to be brought or of previously heard cases to be resurrected."
"Scottish ministers therefore seem at risk of considerably underestimating the total number of cases raised as a result of the Bill and the financial implications for public funds including legal aid, and the budgets of local authorities, the Scottish Government and other public bodies."
The association points out that Scottish judges currently have the discretion to set aside limitation if they are persuaded of the merit in hearing a claim of historic abuse.
Insurers also strongly oppose a provision that would allow claims previously raised but found to be time-barred to be brought again, arguing this would undermine legal certainty in Scotland.
In its submission to the committee, Former Boys and Girls Abused in Quarriers Homes (FBGA) said: "The insurers are a special interest group and have demonstrated that they will resist any opportunity to avoid liability.
"All childhood abuse cases should be given a fair and reasonable hearing process in the Scottish civil courts without exception.
"Victims should be given a full opportunity to present their individual case to the civil courts.
"We fully accept that the defenders have a right to challenge any cases they wish and the change in time-bar legislation will not remove that right."
The proposals are also supported by the Scottish Human Rights Commission, Victim Support Scotland and the Law Society of Scotland.
A Scottish Government spokesman said: "Having listened to the views of survivors, we are legislating to remove the time bar preventing civil action to be taken after the limitation period has expired.
"Cases would only proceed to court on the basis of robust and compelling evidence.
"We will carefully consider all of the submissions to the committee."
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules here