US President Donald Trump is likely to visit Scotland on a state visit to the UK in order to minimise protests, Alex Salmond has said.
The former first minister of Scotland said he believes the royal Balmoral estate in Aberdeenshire would be seen as a better option for Mr Trump to meet the Queen as it would be more difficult for protesters to access.
Mr Trump, whose mother was born on the Isle of Lewis, owns two golf courses in Scotland and took time out of his presidential campaign to mark the reopening of Turnberry in South Ayrshire last year.
The creation of his first Scottish course at Balmedie in Aberdeenshire led to bitter clashes with Mr Salmond over an offshore wind farm planned in sight of the resort.
Mr Salmond said on his LBC radio phone in on Wednesday that he had signed the parliamentary petition calling for Mr Trump's visit to be downgraded from a state visit to spare the Queen "embarrassment".
But in response to a question from a listener, he said he would not seek to bar Mr Trump from visiting Scotland.
The SNP MP said: "You have to respect the office but you don't have to accord somebody the full panoply of a state visit when the greatest presidents on earth and in history had to wait two or three years for it.
"I think him going to Scotland is quite likely, and I'll tell you why.
"If you come to London in current circumstances or with another embarrassment there will be hundreds of thousands certainly, maybe more, people in the streets.
"I think they will see Balmoral as a much, much safer option because even in Scotland, even from my constituency which is adjacent to Balmoral in the north east of Scotland, it takes me a good two hours to get there from my house.
"So I reckon they think Balmoral is a much better option to try and minimise the protesters, but believe me if it was Balmoral, if it's London, if it's Timbuktu, he'll be met by very substantial protests."
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel