Parents are often being left behind and kept in the dark when it comes to the education system, MSPs have heard.
Holyrood's Education Committee was told many parents resort to "cajoling" information from their children on their schooling because they are not involved enough in the process.
Read more: £1.5m to boost nursery staff numbers in deprived areas
The committee was taking evidence from representatives of the Curriculum for Excellence (CfE) management board, which makes recommendations to the Scottish Government on the school curriculum.
Joanna Murphy, of the National Parent Forum of Scotland, said while the group is well represented on the board, parents are often left out of the wider education system.
"The whole process often passes us by," she told MSPs.
Read more: MSPs issue damning report card to SQA
She added it was "telling" that the committee had taken two hours to get on to parents.
"We were kind of mentioned in passing a couple of times," she said. "This is not a battle between parents and everyone else, but I think parents have a lot to give to this.
"We have been on the management board since it started, but in very many other parts of the education system we get brought in at the end just to rubber-stamp, or we are told what's happening, or even worse we're not really told what's happening."
Seamus Searson, general secretary of the Scottish Secondary Teachers' Association, said teachers' voices must also be heard more.
Read more: £1.5m to boost nursery staff numbers in deprived areas
Although the union is also a member of the management board, he said: "We're one voice in a number of voices there. It doesn't really give the prominence of the profession in some of the decision-making.
"If you take, for example, the issues of workload and the changes to the national qualifications, the unions pursued those matters outside of the CfE management board to make those changes."
The unions had been a "voice in the wilderness asking for immediate change", while there are no teaching unions at all represented on the implementation group for CfE.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article