THE senior STV journalist who was allegedly “gagged” by the SNP has resigned.
Digital politics and comment editor Stephen Daisley is to leave his job later this month.
Mr Daisley, who was with the broadcaster for five years, hopes to find work as a freelance writer.
Read more: Journalist 'gagged' by broadcaster after pressure from SNP
A friend said that he had felt “unsupported” by the management at STV.
His departure follows two SNP MPs complaining to his employer about his work, which often mocked the SNP and other parties, and STV then halting his articles on its website.
Pete Wishart, chair of the Commons Scottish Affairs Committee, told STV bosses last year that Mr Daisley’s output was “crap”, while culture spokesman John Nicolson complained about his social media activity.
Mr Daisley, who had written one or two comment pieces for the STV website each week from 2014 until they were terminated last July, was frequently controversial.
He called himself “a friend” of Labour, accused Jeremy Corbyn of supping with anti-Semites, and said the SNP was “expert at mining grievance from even the most innocuous act or statement” and had the “preponderance of zoomers” in Scottish politics.
The SNP MPs complained at an event held by STV managers at Westminster last spring.
Mr Wishart also criticised Mr Daisley on Twitter in June, asking whether his comments were his own view of “just the view of the ‘digital arm’ of the STV family?”
Read more: Journalist 'gagged' by broadcaster after pressure from SNP
That prompted Harry Potter author JK Rowling to ask Mr Wishart: “Is trying to intimidate journalists you dislike @theSNP policy or just a vendetta of your own?”
The following month, Mr Nicolson posted a dozen late-night tweets questioning Mr Daisley's ability and neutrality after he appeared to recommend an infamous Twitter account called Brian Spanner, which posted misogynist abuse of female politicians.
Mr Nicolson, a former BBC journalist, wrote: “[Daisley] is meant to be a neutral journalist - not an activist” and suggested Mr Daisley might be behind the Brian Spanner account.
When the Herald reported Mr Daisley’s articles had stopped, other parties accused the SNP of “gagging” him and criticised STV for “buckling to Nationalist pressure”.
Mr Wishart and Mr Nicolson subsequently confirmed on Twitter they had complained to STV.
Asked if he had mentioned Mr Daisley to STV bosses, Mr Wishart replied: “Yup. I think I also said his contributions were crap (or something like that). Said that because they mainly were.”
Asked the same point, Mr Nicolson replied: “Yes fleetingly - the issue of SD’s [Stephen Daisley’s] pro Spanner tweets and whether this was appropriate for an STV editor.”
STV, which at the time of the controversy said its output had “evolved”, has previously been accused of being too close to the SNP.
Read more: Journalist 'gagged' by broadcaster after pressure from SNP
Its Hogmanay show for 2015/16 featured Nicola Sturgeon, her sister and her mother as guests and was hosted by SNP supporter and independence campaigner Elaine C Smith.
It generated almost 100 complaints alleging political bias.
After the row over Mr Daisley last August, STV editor of news and current affairs Howard Simpson and digital editor Matt Roper both moved to BBC Scotland.
Writing in a newspaper yesterday about press regulation, Scottish Labour leader Kezia Dugdale said Mr Wishart and Mr Nicolson “should be thoroughly ashamed of their attempts to silence those in the media who dare to question the SNP”.
STV refused to go into the background to Mr Daisley’s departure, however a spokeswoman said: “We can confirm that Stephen has resigned.”
The SNP and Mr Daisley both declined to comment.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel