ONE of Scotland's largest councils is embroiled in a stand-off with the Government after revealing plans to ignore a funding deadline amid fears it now risks multi-million pound penalties.
Reigniting the row over local government financing, the leader of North Lanarkshire Council Jim Logue said he would "neither accept nor reject" the cash offer until the Labour-run council had time to consider the implications of the grant, with cuts of £35million on the horizon.
Mr Logue, who said more stand-offs between the Government and other local authorities would emerge soon, accused finance secretary Derek Mackay of undermining his pledge to work with councils by warning them that they had to signal acceptance of the settlement by the January 20.
Read more: SNP under fire as lifeline trauma centres delayed three years
In a recent letter to Scotland's 32 council heads, Mr Mackay said: "For those authorities not agreeing, the offer a revised, and inevitably less favourable, offer will be made."
Although the minister does not spell out what this would entail, his predecessor John Swinney previously warned local government that a failure to sign up could cost them funding, in the case of North Lanarkshire around £20m.
But the Government has repeated its position that it has treated councils fairly and that the package comes "without the need to propose any sanctions or impositions".
It also said North Lanarkshire "would see increased spending power of over £8 million in 2017-18".
In a response letter to the minister Mr Logue said the cash settlement councils were being told to sign up to had yet to be fully approved by the Scottish Parliament and it was therefore unfair to expect local government to agree until the ramifications were explored.
Read more: SNP under fire as lifeline trauma centres delayed three years
It reads: "This is hardly indicative of the partnership working you cite. In the same way that the Scottish Parliament requires to approve your draft budget, this council still requires to consider the full implications of your offer and the impacts of it.
"Until both this council and the Scottish Parliament have exercised their democratic mandates to set their budgets, I can neither accept nor reject an offer which would see the Scottish Government impose significant cuts to vital services upon which the people of North Lanarkshire rely."
Council funding became one of the biggest rows of last November's draft budget with Mr Mackay claiming councils would receive £240m more in 2017-18.
But local authorities, and later Holyrood’s independent information service, said the funding package would actually be the equivalent of a £327m a real terms cut for council budgets.
Speaking last night, Mr Logue said he would not engage in a game of "blinking first" with the government and expected other councils to follow Lanarkshire in refusing to adhere the deadline to accept the funding deal.
And Mr Logue said the impact of council cuts on sections of society was "highlighting the difference between spin and reality" and insisted Mr Mackay had to spell out what local authorities would be liable for if they did not meet the deadline.
Read more: SNP under fire as lifeline trauma centres delayed three years
He added: "I hope Mr Mackay takes his time now. He needs to reflect and use his own experience as a former councillor leader. A starting position would be dialogue, which would certainly be more meaningful than sending out another letter."
A Scottish Government spokeswoman said: "We have been clear from the outset that it wants to work in partnership with local government and in light of this it has provided local authorities with a funding package and a number of joint priorities without the need to propose any sanctions or impositions.
"That was a fundamental principle agreed as an outcome of the negotiations with Cosla. It is now up to each individual local authority to accept the full package of measures and benefits.”
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel