VOTERS should be allowed to take part in a special public session of First Minister's Questions, Scottish Labour has said.
The party has called for the weekly question-and-answer session at Holyrood to move out of the capital once a year and allow members of the public to send questions directly to the First Minister.
The idea is among several Labour will submit to an independent commission set up by Holyrood Presiding Officer Ken Macintosh and charged with reviewing how the Scottish Parliament works.
Labour has also suggested a backbench MSP-only session of First Minister's Questions and that the parliament's finance committee undertake an annual tour to ensure people across Scotland have a chance to scrutinise the Scottish Government's budget proposals.
Glasgow Labour MSP James Kelly said the reforms would make the parliament more open and transparent.
He said: "The Scottish Parliament has more powers over tax and spending than ever before yet power is increasingly being centralised by this SNP government to Edinburgh.
"Labour will propose that Holyrood opens up its doors to the voters with an annual session outside Edinburgh where voters can send questions direct to the First Minister."
A Scottish Government spokeswoman, in response, said: "Decisions on reforming parliamentary business are for the Scottish Parliament to consider and decide upon, although we are always open to any positive changes.
"This Government is already the most open and transparent ever. Travelling Cabinets are now a well-established feature, with Ministers touring the length and breadth of the country to engage with communities and to answer questions on any topic they choose to raise.
"The weekly First Minister's Question time sessions have also been extended by 15 minutes at the First Minister's suggestion, and she has also offered to appear more frequently before meetings of all committee convenors. Similarly there have never been more ways to get in touch with Scotland's First Minister, either online, through her dedicated website, or at the large number of public events she attends every year."
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel