AROUND one in six adults have done, or are intending to take, an online course as the programmes become more popular with the public and employers.
Many are signing up for “moocs” – massive open online courses – in a bid to further their careers, while for others it is a way of pursuing a personal interest, according to research.
The study, by Futurelearn, the Open University and Parthenon-EY, also reveals that employers are increasingly using the courses to differentiate between job applicants. And it shows that graduates would like to have studied for at least part of their degree through online modules.
Overall, 15 per cent of those surveyed for the research said they have either taken a short online course, or intend to do so.
This suggests that doing such a course is becoming a mainstream activity for UK consumers, the study concluded.
It adds: “For the majority, short online courses are a means to differentiate themselves in an increasingly competitive job market.
“For a significant minority, they are done out of pure interest in learning more about the world which surrounds them.”
Some 332 the 485 potential learners questioned already had a degree, of which around half (47 per cent) said they would have preferred to take at least part of their degree as a series of online modules.
The study, which also surveyed 510 employers, found that about a third said it is more difficult to differentiate between candidates than it was three years ago. And Nearly half said short courses are a differentiating factor between applicants.
The report concludes: “As short online courses become commonplace, learning will become easier to fit alongside everyday life, thus opening up learning to those who had previously struggled to overcome the barriers, and providing a tangible means by which learning can be scaled to reach everyone who needs it.”
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel