Professor David Bell
In just three decades, between 1961 and 1991, so many people left Scotland that our population fell by 600,000.
So it was no surprise back in 2001 when the National Records of Scotland predicted a further decline of 120,000 to 4.9 million by 2016. They were out by half a million. The most recently estimate for the number of people living in our country is 5.4m.
What made the difference? Improving economic performance in Scotland and increased access to our labour market for workers from poorer parts of the world, notably Eastern Europe, made Scotland an attractive place to seek work.
Has this reversal in its demographic trends improved Scotland’s economic performance? It is clear that migrants have played an important role in filling labour shortages where it is hard to find native workers - such as in hospitality and tourism. Others have taken seasonal jobs in Scotland’s important agriculture and food sectors. Migrants have also made significant contributions in construction, financial services, higher education and the NHS. They also play an important role in transferring technology, skills and business connections across borders. These effects are vital drivers of Scotland’s future economic growth.
Some argue that migrants have had a negative effect on opportunities for native Scots in the labour market.
The evidence for this is not strong. Scotland’s unemployment rate for June-August 2016 was 4.6 per cent. This is very low by Scotland’s historical standards and compares well with the EU average of 10 per cent. In contrast, during years of net emigration in 1970s and 1980s, Scotland’s unemployment rate was well above the UK average. Substantial net immigration to Scotland began in 2003. From 1992, when consistently reliable unemployment data became available, until 2003, Scotland’s unemployment rate averaged 8.1 per cent, above the UK average. Since 2003, when the inflow of overseas migrants really began, Scottish unemployment has averaged 6.1 per cent, exactly equal to the UK average.
There is also little evidence that immigrant labour has driven down the wages of less skilled workers in Scotland – those on low wages. Since 2003, weekly earnings of the poorest paid 10 per cent of Scottish workers have increased slightly faster than those of the typical (median) worker.
Westminster intends to reduce net overseas migration to the UK to the “tens of thousands”. Setting a net migration target is a hostage to fortune because it requires government control over outflows of migrants, as well as inflows.
In the absence of mass emigration by Brits, the only way for the Government to achieve its target would be to bear down even more heavily on migration into the UK. In 2015, Scotland accounted for around 6 per cent of total net overseas migration into the UK of 330,000. Reducing this to less than 100,000 would likely mean that Scotland’s net migration from overseas would be cut to just a few thousand. That is not enough.
Given that deaths currently exceed births in Scotland, the only way in which our population could continue to increase would be if we have net immigration from the rest of the UK. This flow has been in Scotland’s favour over the last five years but has only averaged 6000. Thus, a drastic reduction in net migration to the UK combined with recent trends in births, deaths and migration from the rest of the UK, is likely to slow and possibly end, Scotland’s population growth.
The economic consequences for Scotland of the reduction in migration are likely to be pervasive: businesses will find it difficult to fill vacancies with appropriately skilled and competent staff. Problems will be particularly acute in agriculture, food processing, hospitality, construction and in the health service, where recruitment difficulties are widespread and likely to worsen as many of the baby-boomer generation retire.
Scottish higher education will also be affected by the unwillingness of the UK Government to exclude foreign students from the net immigration target. Even though the evidence suggests that foreign students are unlikely to overstay their courses, this valuable source of foreign earnings is likely to further decline.
It is difficult to see how the message of being an open trading nation can be consistent with the proposed cut in net migration. Scotland’s economy does not have a particularly strong export record: reducing its access to foreign workers and their expertise will make it even more difficult to expand its external trade.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel