Scotland's Children's Commissioner will be asked for his view on armed forces' visits to schools amid claims they are targeting deprived pupils for recruitment.
Religious group Quakers in Scotland and military recruitment watchdog Forces Watch told MSPs the armed forces "may be attempting to target students from more disadvantaged backgrounds".
A submission to Holyrood's Public Petitions Committee said: "Education Scotland said in 2015 that the Ministry of Defence had requested school deprivation data following an earlier attempt to obtain a database of sensitive student information for England in order to better target Army recruitment.
"In 2013 the Army stated that its schools careers advice 'is often more tailored and directed to those at risk of disengaging with education or work or those who struggle academically'."
They are seeking guidance on how school visits should be conducted to ensure "political balance and offer a realistic representation of the role of the armed forces and what a career in the armed forces involves".
They are also calling for public monitoring of the number and location of visits, the purpose and content of visits and comparison with the number of visits by other employers.
Parents/guardians should also be consulted as to whether they are happy for their child to take part in armed forces' activities at school, they said.
Committee convener Johann Lamont said MSPs should ask the Scottish Government and councils for their views.
"I can see in some localities with a strong connection to the army individual schools might be very keen on this but in other areas there is less of a connection," she said.
"We would also want to contact the Army, in terms of their careers service, for their response to the petition."
The committee may also contact Skills Development Scotland for their view, she added.
She added: "The Children and Young People's Commissioner and the Scottish Youth Parliament may have a view on this.
"This is a list that we can expand because we're really trying to get the information and sense of where people are with this.
"There is a dilemma between particular communities being targeted, but also recognising that some young people can potentially get good employment outcomes from making an active choice to go into the armed forces.
"We need to get a sense of what that looks like, what the safeguards are and the extent to which it is not being targeted at particular communities."
Children and Young People's Commissioner Scotland Tam Baillie said: "Too many 16 and 17-year-olds are currently being recruited to the UK Armed Forces.
"This age group makes up a fifth of all recruits and the UN Committee on the Rights of the Child has expressed its concern that schools in the UK are used as recruitment grounds for the armed forces.
"I would like to see the minimum recruitment age raised to 18 years, in line with UN recommendations, and for the armed forces to no longer actively target people aged under 18 - this would include strictly limiting the army's access to schools.
"Scotland, in particular, has high numbers of such visits and they often target groups who are disadvantaged. It is imperative that potential recruits, of any age, are properly informed of the risks and obligations that follow enlistment."
An MoD spokesman said: "The Armed Forces never visit schools for recruitment purposes and would only ever visit a school after being invited by a teacher to support school activities.
"These visits are of great benefit to pupils, and the three services consider it their duty to explain to children their role to protect the nation, and pass on valuable skills such as leadership, teamwork and citizenship."
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel