A TOP civil servant is facing calls to resign amid claims she said it was “OK” for abuse victims to die if their demise resulted in greater support in future cases where there was a risk of suicide.
Campaigners are urging Deputy First Minister John Swinney to remove a senior official linked to the inquiry into historic abuse at Scottish care homes following a string of complaints about her conduct.
READ MORE: Revealed: Scottish firms fronting global child-porn websites
Jessica McPherson works closely with victims of abuse in her role setting up Survivor Scotland, a fund which supports those giving evidence to the inquiry. She is head of delivery, care rights and support, at the Scottish Goverment.
She is alleged to have offended abuse survivors and charity leaders by saying “it was OK for clients to die for change to happen” during a discussion about inadequate support for victims who could become suicidal.
Janine Rennie, chief executive of abuse charity Open Secret, and project manager Safia Ali claim to have heard the alleged remark during a meeting to discuss a support team being established on August 24 last year.
The two charity workers say that they were shocked and twice asked Ms McPherson to retract her comments, but she repeated and confirmed them.
A client of Open Secret said that on a separate occasion, when he spoke of having suicidal thoughts, Ms McPherson asked why he had failed to get over the abuse he had received.
READ MORE: Revealed: Scottish firms fronting global child-porn websites
Paul, who did not wish to disclose his surname, said: “She said ‘haven’t you moved on?
“I felt seriously let down.”
It is understood at least three grievances have been lodged with the Scottish Government about Ms McPherson’s conduct.
John Swinney, whose remit as Education Secretary includes the Scottish Child Abuse Inquiry has told Falkirk East MSP Angus MacDonald that the allegations had been examined by former minister for mental health Jamie Hepburn MSP.
In a letter to Mr MacDonald, Mr Swinney said Ms McPherson had been fully exonerated by an investigation and that this had concluded the behaviour by Ms McPherson was “entirely correct”.
But Jannie Rennie, who heard the alleged comment, said neither she nor Ms Ali were ever interviewed about the incident they witnessed.
READ MORE: Revealed: Scottish firms fronting global child-porn websites
Meanwhile Ms McPherson was also become the focus of a several damaging allegations from White Flowers Alba, which also represents and campaigns for abuse victims, the majority of whom suffered in Catholic institutions.
Three abuse survivors signed a statement claiming that when told of alleged sexual abuse perpetrated against White Flowers chairman Andi Lavery at school, she said: ““It’s alright, it’s only Andi”.
This statement also alleges Ms McPherson has belittled Mr Lavery and been hostile to the involvement of their group, commenting on another occasion “these guys don’t matter.”
Ms McPherson has also alienated members of the group In Care Abuse Survivors Scotland (INCAS), on one occasion responding angrily to the presence of their lawyer at a meeting in 2015, with the result that he was excluded from the meeting.
Helen Holland, deputy chair of INCAS, said: “I’ve worked with civil servants for 16 years. I think [Ms McPherson] has been the most difficult of all of them.”
Ms Holland says “her attitude is that if someone has been having counselling, shouldn’t they be getting on with their life, shouldn’t they be better now? She has a misunderstanding of abuse and how it affects people. It concerns me that the Government would allow someone from that background to work with survivors. When you are talking about the abuse of children, you can’t have that attitude.”
In his letter dismissing the claims from Open Secret, Mr Swinney says the charity has been asked not to “denigrate” officials.
But the charity says they are providing evidence of misconduct.
Open Secret colleagues, Ms Rennie and Ms Ali, deny any suggestion that their claims arise from bad grace over losing the contract to provide counselling to those involved in the child abuse inquiry.
Despite the potential cost to Open Secret of falling out with the Government, they have the backing of the charity’s board.
Ms Rennie said they chose not to bid for the work over concerns about the approach the government was taking, and added: “why would I make this up? It is professional suicide to say these things - we will never win a contract again.”
Those expressing concern about Ms McPherson contrast the approach taken by Mr Swinney to widespread concerns about her attitude and comments to the abrupt action he took when claims were made about the former chair of the Inquiry Susan O’Brien QC.
In response to comments Ms O’Brien allegedly made in February, the education secretary began a process to sack her as chair, on the grounds that her comments - which had been made in a private meeting - might reach the ears of abuse survivors and discredit the inquiry.
Speaking about Ms McPherson, Mr Lavery said: “She is universally unpopular. She needs to be sacked and action taken.”
The Herald asked the Scottish Government press office to invite Ms McPherson to comment or to respond on her behalf.
A Scottish Government spokesman said: “We do not comment on individual members of staff.
“Whenever serious issues, such as this, are raised with us, we examine them. We did this when these matters were first raised and would always do so if further information came to light.”
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel