The first new UK nuclear power station in a generation faces a fresh delay after the Government said it will not make a decision until the autumn.
After years of delay, a board meeting of energy giant EDF in Paris voted by 10-7 to give the go ahead for the £18 billion Hinkley Point power station.
The vote was closer than expected but was warmly welcomed by business groups and trade unions, with 25,000 jobs now set to be created.
READ MORE: One in three Scots 'favour Brexit deal wait before independence poll decision'
Documents were expected to be signed on Friday and senior EDF officials were due to give interviews.
But the Government pulled back from any signing ceremonies, prompting fresh question marks about the start of the much-delayed project.
Business and Energy Secretary Greg Clark said: "The UK needs a reliable and secure energy supply and the Government believes that nuclear energy is an important part of the mix.
"The Government will now consider carefully all the component parts of this project and make its decision in the early autumn."
Mr Clark only returned from a three-day trade visit to Japan earlier on Thursday and is now expected to spend time studying details of the EDF decision.
Opponents seized on the Government statement to call on ministers to halt the project.
John Sauven, Greenpeace's executive director, said: "Theresa May now has a chance to stop this radioactive white elephant in its tracks.
"She should look at the evidence and see that this deal would be a monumental disaster for taxpayers and bill payers. The UK needs to invest in safe, reliable renewable power.
"The Government should be embracing new innovative technologies that are powering Northern European countries already and coming down in price every year.
READ MORE: One in three Scots 'favour Brexit deal wait before independence poll decision'
"We don't want to be left behind and locked into an old-fashioned nuclear power plant that isn't working anywhere in the world and isn't fit for the 21st century."
EDF's chief executive Vincent de Rivaz was expected in Somerset on Friday morning alongside senior company officials to give interviews about the project. But following the government statement it emerged that no interviews would be given.
Conservative MP Zac Goldsmith tweeted: "It's hard to imagine a worse deal than Hinkley Point project. If this pause equals a genuine rethink by Government, that's very good news."
There was speculation that the Prime Minister was involved in the move to allow time to study the details before any deal is signed and sealed.
Critics believe the Government has been stung by criticism of the amount of money EDF will be paid for generating power from Hinkley - £92.50 per unit of electricity generated.
Unite national officer for energy Kevin Coyne said the decision by EDF was historic and urged the Government to sign the contracts as a matter of urgency.
"Any further delay or backsliding would hold back the economic boost and the accompanying creation of thousands of skilled jobs that this major infrastructure project will bring," he said.
"Our members are shovel ready to start work on the country's first nuclear power station for a generation and British companies are at the ready to build and supply this £18 billion project."
China General Nuclear, which has a stake of a third in the Hinkley project, said: "We respect the new government's need to familiarise itself with a project as important to the UK's future energy security as Hinkley Point C and we stand ready to help the Government in this respect.
"CGN remains committed to delivering this much needed nuclear capacity with our strategic partners EDF, and providing the UK with safe, reliable and sustainable energy.
READ MORE: One in three Scots 'favour Brexit deal wait before independence poll decision'
Hinkley will provide 7% of the UK's generation needs for 60 years and is scheduled to begin generating power in 2025, a lot later than the promise made by Mr de Rivaz in 2007, who said Britain would be cooking Christmas turkeys on new nuclear power by 2017.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article