CHILDREN should be banned from buying energy drinks because of the risks to their health, according to a new report.
Research suggests energy drinks – many of which are promoted by leading sports stars – can cause headaches, stomach pain and sleeping problems because of their high caffeine and sugar content.
READ MORE: Irn-Bru maker AG Barr defends energy drinks strategy
But a survey involving 16 European countries, including the UK, shows more than two-thirds of 11 to 18-year-olds and nearly one-fifth of under-10s regularly consume the caffeinated drinks.
Red Bull, Lucozade Energy, Lucozade Sport and Monster Energy, part-owned by Coca-Cola - Britain’s biggest-selling energy drinks - are among the most popular brands in the UK.
The new report, published by the Food Research Collaboration, highlights figures from the US that show emergency department visits caused by energy drinks have doubled between 2007 and 2011.
READ MORE: Teachers warn pupil violence "fuelled" by high-energy drinks
The reports says UK policy makers must act against excessive consumption by British kids – who are the biggest customers in Europe.
Study author Kawther Hashem, a nutritionist and researcher at pressure group Action on Sugar based at Queen Mary University of London, said: “Children and teenagers are being deceived into drinking large cans of energy drinks, thinking they are going to improve their performance at school, during sports, or even on a night out.
“In reality, it’s more likely increasing their risk of developing obesity, type 2 diabetes and dental caries, which will have lifelong implications on their health.”
“The Government needs to set strict limits on added sugars in these products and ban the sale to children under 16 because of their high caffeine, calorie and sugar content.”
READ MORE: Irn-Bru maker AG Barr defends energy drinks strategy
The UK Government has already announced a tax on sugary drinks as a step towards tackling childhood obesity but the researchers say energy drinks usually contain high amounts of both sugar and caffeine.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article