THERESA May was last night urged to postpone a long-awaited Commons vote on the renewal of Trident amid the “unprecedented turmoil” of Brexit, and to tell MPs its true cost.
SNP Westminster leader Angus Robertson warned the Prime Minister she would start her premiership on the wrong note if she pushed ahead with tomorrow’s vote.
It was too important to rush through parliament after a month of “back-stabbing, score settling and navel-gazing” among the Conservatives and Labour, he said.
Robertson also said that, whenever the vote came, MPs must know the full 30-year lifetime costs of maintaining the UK’s nuclear deterrent.
The current estimate of £167bn was based on “partial information”, he said, and the Campaign for Nuclear Disarmament had put the true figure at £205bn.
The timing of tomorrow’s vote was decided last week by David Cameron, while he was still expecting to stay on as Prime Minister until September.
However, May has also backed a vote before the summer recess begins on Thursday, saying it would be “sheer madness” to give up the deterrent given the many security threats facing the UK.
Trident has three main elements - four Vanguard class submarines based at Faslane on the Clyde, which provide a continuous at-sea deterrent, Trident II D5 Ballistic missiles leased from the US, and nuclear warheads, stored eight miles from Faslane at Coulport.
The Commons voted 409-61 in principle to maintain Trident beyond its current service life in 2007, paving the way for £3bn of design work on new submarines.
The last coalition government promised MPs would also have a vote on “main gate” - the point-of-no-return decision to invest and proceed to manufacture with the new subs.
However the new Tory government dropped its plan for a definitive main gate decision in December, and tomorrow’s vote will be another on the general principle of a nuclear deterrent using four Successor class submarines.
With a Conservative majority in the Commons and UK Labour still having the deterrent as its policy, despite Jeremy Corbyn’s lifelong opposition to nuclear weapons, the vote is virtually guaranteed to pass, despite the opposition of almost every Scottish MP.
Robertson said: “Trident is an immoral, obscene and redundant weapons system.
“Over the last few weeks we have witnessed unprecedented political turmoil, as the entire Westminster system was shown to be completely unprepared for the prospect of a Brexit vote.
“Having spent the best part of a month engaged in backstabbing, score-settling and navel-gazing, neither the Tories nor Labour are in any fit state to be giving proper scrutiny to decisions as important as this.”
In a joint statement last week, eight Catholic bishops in Scotland urged the UK Government to take “decisive and courageous steps” towards disarmament, and said “lives are being lost now because money that could be spent on the needy and the poor is tied up in nuclear arsenals”.
The Church of Scotland also said it would be “morally and economically indefensible” to spend hundreds of billions on weapons of mass destruction, especially when services were being cut.
Robertson added: “Theresa May has make big commitments about a new style of government. I would urge her to put her words into action by showing that the Tories’ political games around Trident are a thing of the past – and allow MPs, and the public, the fully informed debate that they deserve.”
A UK government insider said: “The SNP’s call for delay is a bit rich given this has been debated for years, not least 18 months ago when the SNP led and lost a vote in the Commons.”
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel