APPLE is reportedly considering a potential takeover bid for Jay Z's music-streaming service Tidal.
The technology giant is exploring the idea of acquiring Tidalbecause of its strong ties to popular artists including Kanye West and Madonna, according to the Wall Street Journal.
Sources told the newspaper that "exploratory talks" were continuing and they may not result in a deal.
READ MORE: Are you going to T in the Park? Here are the top tips you need to prepare
But a Tidal spokesman denied its executives had discussed a deal with Apple, the Wall Street Journal said.
Jay Z joined forces with a host of music stars in March last year to unveil Tidal as a rival to Spotify, following criticism of the amount they pay acts in royalties.
Swedish technology company Aspiro, which owned Tidal, was bought out by the rap mogul for 56 million dollars (£42 million).
Jay Z was joined at a launch event in New York by West, Alicia Keys and his wife Beyonce, who have stakes in the company, along with fellow Tidal co-owners Calvin Harris and Chris Martin, who appeared via video link.
Last month West used Tidal to unveil the controversial video to his song Famous, featuring depictions of a host of naked celebrities including Taylor Swift.
READ MORE: Are you going to T in the Park? Here are the top tips you need to prepare
Madonna's video for the track B**** I'm Madonna was also shown exclusively on the service for 24 hours before being released to the wider public.
Tidal is also the only streaming service offering the back catalogue of the late music superstar Prince, who died in April after an accidental overdose.
The site's flagship £19.99 monthly subscription fee - which includes high definition audio and HD music videos - is double the amount of the highest Spotify monthly cost. Tidalalso offers a £9.99 monthly deal in line with its rivals.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article