ENVIRONMENTAL groups have hit out at "woeful" statistics that show the number of trees being planted in Scotland has plummeted to its lowest level in six years.
Forestry Commission figures revealed that 4,600 hectares of woodland, the equivalent of 18 square miles, has been planted in Scotland in 2015/16, well short of a Scottish Government target of 10,000 hectares.
Woodland Trust Scotland called on the Fergus Ewing, the new environment secretary, to deliver on a manifesto commitment to meet the target and "hasten the pace" of tree planting across the country.
Charles Dundas, Public Affairs Manager at the charity, said: "These are woeful figures. We need to get on track to meet these targets for the sake of every person in the country. Trees help fight the causes and impacts of climate change - both removing CO2 and contributing to flood defences. They improve air quality, water quality and biodiversity, and are an economic asset. Their impact touches the life or everyone in Scotland. This rate of planting is not serving the people of Scotland well. It's not just about wildlife and scenery. It's about the wellbeing of the entire nation.
"Problems and delays with the Forestry Grants process over the last year, and the change over from one system to another was always going to impact on the planting rates, but this number of trees in the ground is disastrous for Scotland."
In February, it emerged that plans to plant 100 million trees in Scotland by the end of 2015 has been missed by more than 11m. The Scottish Government unveiled their target in 2010 as part of a bid to cut emissions across the country.
The growth of the nation's forests by 3.7 per cent was touted as a flagship scheme for the government - as it hoped to demonstrate Scotland could lead the way on tackling pollution and climate change. The dramatic shortfall was blamed on difficulties negotiating with farmers and landowners.
However, despite the figures disappointing charities, the new Forestry Commission statistics showed that almost 85 per cent of new planting across the UK in the last financial year came in Scotland.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel