The Duke of Buccleuch has come under fire for failing to protect residents and ramblers from toxic ponds left over from lead mining in the Dumfries and Galloway hills.
Local people are furious that no action has been taken on a recommendation in an official report two years ago that fencing should be put up to prevent the public from being harmed by hazardous levels of lead and zinc in the Queensberry tailing ponds near Wanlockhead, the highest village in Scotland.
They accuse Buccleuch, the UK’s largest private landowner who owns much of the area, of “environmental carelessness”. The contaminated ponds are skirted by a long-distance footpath used by hundreds of walkers every year.
Pollution of Wanloch Water from old lead workings operated by Buccleuch and others in the past has been investigated by the UK government’s Coal Authority for the Scottish Environment Protection Agency (Sepa).
A report completed in 2014 found high levels of toxic heavy metals such as lead, zinc and cadmium in the river in breach of environmental quality standards. Much of the pollution came from the Queensberry tailing ponds, which contain wastes from centuries of metal mining.
The report recommended a series of measures to clean up the ponds, which are followed along their southern edges by the Southern Upland Way, an official walking route from coast to coast across Scotland.
It said: “Because of the high percentages of lead and zinc detected in the Queensberry tailings pond sediment, it is recommended that the area should be fenced off to prevent livestock and deter members of the public from entering the site.”
The report also urged further studies into the dangers of contaminated dust being blown into the air in dry weather and inhaled by walkers or residents. The impact of wildlife also needed to be investigated, it said.
But so far no action has been taken to protect the public. “It is deeply disconcerting that, almost two years after this report was published, neither Buccleuch estate nor the local authority have undertaken the necessary steps to ensure that the Queensberry tailing ponds are fenced off,” said Karin Oostindjer, a local resident and keen hillwalker.
“As the landowner, Buccleuch should have, at the very least, a moral duty, to erect the fencing as a means to protect members of the public, their dogs and any livestock, from the heavy metal pollution.”
Androulla Richford, who lives in Wanlockhead, was also concerned for the safety of children and livestock. “I would say it is negligence and a sign of poor land stewardship as well as environmental carelessness,” she said.
“A fence would at least give unsuspecting people as well as livestock a chance not to wander on polluted land or water.”
The Scottish Labour MSP for the South of Scotland, Claudia Beamish, has written to Buccleuch asking for a fence to be erected. “I am disappointed that access to Queensberry tailings ponds has not been restricted by a fence despite this recommendation,” she told the Sunday Herald.
“It has long been known there are increased levels of contamination in the ponds and as we move into the summer months, with increased visitors and locals using the area it seems an essential time to do it.”
Dave Morris, a veteran countryside campaigner and former director of Ramblers Scotland, said: “The appropriate authorities need to identify who is responsible for erecting this fencing and ensure that it is put in place as soon as possible, along with signage to warn of the pollution danger.”
Sepa confirmed that Buccleuch was the landowner, and suggested that it would be his responsibility to erect a fence, along with the local authority. “Sepa will continue to work with Dumfries and Galloway Council and other relevant partner organisations to improve any water contamination issues in the area,” said a Sepa spokesman.
Dumfries and Galloway Council said it was investigating the matter. “While the council is responsible for maintaining the Southern Upland Way, it is not the landowner,” a council spokesman said.
Buccleuch pointed out that dealing with the legacy from old mine workings in the area involved Sepa, local authorities, health bodies and local landowners. “A multi-agency public health risk assessment said the risk to human health was low,” said a spokesman for the estate.
“The UK Coal Authority report recommendations did not state that Buccleuch should be responsible for fencing off the area in question and no regulatory or enforcement order has been issued. However, Buccleuch takes its environmental responsibilities seriously and is pursuing the pond sediment fencing issue through dialogue with Dumfries and Galloway Council.”
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel