The Scottish Government has been urged to reconsider its position on the safety of the conviction of Lockerbie bomber Abdelbaset al-Megrahi following the publication of a book by former justice secretary Kenny MacAskill.
SNP MSP Christine Grahame, former convener of Holyrood's Justice Committee, said there is "definitely" reason to doubt its safety.
Following the publication of his book, Mr MacAskill, who sparked an international outcry when he released the Libyan on compassionate grounds in 2009, said the conviction was "probably unsafe".
Read more: Revealed - MacAskill may have breached Official Secrets Act over Lockerbie
At First Minister's Questions at Holyrood, Ms Grahame, a signatory to the Justice for Megrahi campaign, referred to key evidence relating to the clothing found in the suitcase used to carry the bomb.
She said: "Given that there is an issue that the former justice secretary and the former first minister now both state that Megrahi was not the purchaser of the clothes in Malta and having regard to the findings of the Scottish Criminal Cases Review Commission (SCCRC) that if Megrahi was not the purchaser there was insufficient evidence to convict him, can I ask the Government to reconsider its position, and I quote, that they say there is no reason to doubt the safety of this conviction, because surely there is definitely now?"
First Minister Nicola Sturgeon said: "It is not for me, for any First Minister or for any member of the Government to decide that a conviction is unsafe.
"That is a matter for the courts of the land. That is the case in this case and it is the case in any other criminal matter."
Ms Sturgeon said it remained open for Megrahi's close relatives to ask the SCCRC to refer the case to the appeal court.
Read more: Iain Macwhirter - Unanswered questions in MacAskill Lockerbie revelations
She added: "Ministers have repeatedly made clear that they would be comfortable if that was to happen but that is the process that must be undertaken if this case is to be looked at by the appeal court."
The issue was raised by new Tory MSP Douglas Ross, who called on Ms Sturgeon to ask the new Lord Advocate to investigate Mr MacAskill over the book.
Dismissing his question as "ludicrous", Ms Sturgeon responded: "In fairness to the member I know he hasn't been in parliament for very long but you know, the First Minister does not direct the Lord Advocate when it comes to investigations. That is a pretty fundamental element of our constitution."
The First Minister said a draft copy of the book was provided to the Scottish Government's permanent secretary in February but she had not had the opportunity to read it herself.
She added: "I'm sure it's an interesting read but of course the content of it is a matter for Kenny and for his publishers.
"In terms of the Lockerbie conviction, the conviction stands, I say again as the Crown Office have said in the past that there is confidence in the safety of that conviction and of course for that conviction to be overturned there would require to be an appeal taken and an appeal being successful."
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel