WILLIE Rennie has claimed that Liberal Democrats have been shown to be the most rigorous in scrutinising the Scottish Government, after new figures revealed his MSPs asked more questions than their counterparts from any other party.
The most up to date statistics show that LibDems asked 2,416 written questions in the first four-and-a-half years of the last Holyrood term, translating to 483 queries each for its five MSPs.
Scottish Labour MSPs asked 13,019 questions, but as the party had far more representation in the Parliament, the average questions per MSP was 342. The Scottish Tories asked 201 questions on average each, while for SNP members, the figure was 38.
MSPs are able to submit questions to Scottish ministers on any topic they want, with the queries typically answered within 10 days in which parliament is sitting. It is estimated that each question costs on average £100 to answer, meaning a total bill across all parties of more than £2 million.
Mr Rennie said: "These figures are testament to just how much Scottish Liberal Democrats MSPs punched above their weight in the last Parliament.
"Voters want elected representatives who can be trusted to hold the government to account. Instead, what they got in the last election was a herd of backbenchers who nodded through £500 million in council cuts and the creation of Police Scotland without a single voice dissenting
"MSPs should be making sure government is working for voters. These figures prove Liberal Democrats have the strongest record in parliament of making sure ministers are actually doing that. We have the guts to challenge ministers and provide the scrutiny government so desperately needs."
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel